this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
86 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

85571 readers
3516 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 7 hours ago

It's amazing how all the things they are doing allegedly to protect kids will also be used by them to more efficiently prey on kids.

I wonder why that would be.

[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

What is it with Republicans and kids?

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 21 points 10 hours ago

We need to PROTECT the Children by ALLOWING Corporations LEGAL PROTECTION to do WHATEVER they Want to Children!

-LITERALLY Every Single Republican Voter!

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 21 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I feel like that is a sort of protection that should never, ever be granted under any circumstances. Like you'd better feel comfortable going in front of a judge and explaining how you made every reasonable effort to protect children or you need to stay the fuck away from children.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

The problem isn't that Meta employed too few techniques to figure out if somebody was a child. The problem is they employed so much surveillance that they incidentally found out people were children and then they decided to abuse and exploit that information to their fiscal advantage.

It's an important distinction. I don't think we should encourage companies to collect detailed 3D scans of people's faces or their ID cards just to verify their ~~identity~~ age.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 11 points 11 hours ago

TBF the administration is trying to distract from the fact its leaders abuse kids. They are all just pretending. They have no care and plan no responsibility. Why should they? They know it will be tolerated.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 9 points 12 hours ago

They ask for merciful punishment without admitting the crimes?

[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 7 points 11 hours ago

When I figure out how best to run for a political position, no mercy will be given. Debating which route to go and can't really do 2026 as it's too late, but I'll be damned I'm so sick of big tech or corps getting breaks while the rest of us suffer.

[–] Amoxtli@thelemmy.club 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Block people under age of 18 from using social media. Problem solved.

[–] starblursd@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

The problem with this is sounds great on paper until you explain how it's done... Which is everyone having to verify their age by submitting sensitive documents to random corporations that get breached all the time and hand over an easy way for governments to see absolutely everything someone does on the internet

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Exactly. That will also cut off their pipeline of new addicts