this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
603 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

86219 readers
3407 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 148 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Lol. Lmao even. Rofl perhaps.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But it stops clearly short of roflmao, I infer?

[–] gedfromgont@piefed.ca 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The roflcopter has left the pad. No sleep til LOLWTFBBQ

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] alansuspect@quokk.au 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Roflcopter?

Hey hey hey hey hey whoa whoa let's just keep the big guns in reserve for now, ok?

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Ai bubble burst will be the time.

Too bad it’s going to hurt so many people too

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Albuquerque New Mexico...

IYKYK

[–] Supamanc@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

Albuquerque New Mexico period period period exclamation mark

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 85 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Something I’ve been noticing recently is that while the cost per token on specific models hasn’t gone up, the provided interfaces for using those models are starting to chew up significantly larger numbers of tokens for the same tasks that used fewer tokens with older versions of the interface software just a few months ago. Likely the interfaces are applying more expensive guardrail prompts and charging the end user for those tokens — but the end result is that it costs 4x as much to get the same work done.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 19 points 1 week ago (13 children)

"Tokens" are just made up.

These "tokens" that are used to "measure" how much you use, they are not a real dimension that can be measured. Just an artificial counter that goes up when they decide that it should go up.

They can change the "size" of a "token" every day, and every second, and every microsecond....

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Not entirely wrong, but tokens are not just "fake" in the way, for example, an in-game currency is. They're the fundamental "units" of data, both input and output, processed by the model. For most models, tokens are just a certain number of characters or words. So they're not completely untethered from the model. If we're both using Clankerbot v5.1: Sloppy Logic Edition™️, your tokens are defined in the same way mine are.

This is near the edge of my limited understanding, but AFAIK, yeah they can mess with token costs and billing schemes all they want. They could theoretically charge us 2 different costs per token, or do surge pricing or some shit.

if they wanted to change the actual size/definition of what a token is though, that would require a whole new model (or at least a major revision).

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You aren't totally wrong. Such a unit exists and it is also called tokens, that can measure the capability of a model and the size of a running operation in a model.

But what they use for calculating your bill is something different today.

[–] hubobes@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

That doesn't make much sense. When Anthropic moved to Sonnet 5 they introduced a new tokenizer which increased token use up to 35%. If these would be unrelated kinds of tokens why would the usage go up when the process of tokenization changes?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nitroemdash@lemmy.wtf 17 points 1 week ago

Tokens are well-defined groups of bytes ranged by frequency of occurrence in texts to efficiently translate them into a sequence of 32 or 64-bit binary integers, an LLM-optimised form if compression. They are well-known, you can play with them here: https://gpt-tokenizer.dev/

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] _wizard@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (7 children)

My CLAUDE.md file bloated significantly. It tried to load unnecessary skills and would retain throughout the whole session. Fixing that, maintaining good wikis and using clear often really helped fixed my personal token burn.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zulu@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How is it too expensive? Surely it's generating way more profit than it would cost in value. How else could it be propping up the entire economy?

Itd have to be some kind of bubble and that would mean we were in a lottttt of danger and should reasses our use of it.

Nah we should just reduce our use because its too expensive and then stop thinking about it beyond that.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Itd have to be some kind of bubble and that would mean we were in a lottttt of danger and should reasses our use of it.

Well yeah, but if it were the only sector propping up the whole economy and we reassessed it, the economy would be in a loooooot of danger anyway.

Luckily, that would never happen...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] funkyshoe@piefed.social 35 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That's funny now that whole workflows are automated with it. Oops hit the quota, I'm off

[–] grue@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You mean those workflows that could've been traditional scripting and CI/CD, if not for management forcing AI into them? Those workflows?

[–] funkyshoe@piefed.social 8 points 1 week ago

Those workflows

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is actually how the bubble begins to pop, we're seeing it happen now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 31 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I’m confused. I thought employers loved AI and it was the future.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

They loved it too much and now it costs more than paying a living wage to a human being. The end goal of AI was always to cut cost and layoff people. The best sabotage right now is to setup a script that constantly prompts an LLM for something useless. I would recommend it if it didn't waste so much energy and clean water. But it would send a message. AI is not cheaper, it never was. Even with today's outrageous token prices, LLM companies are still bleeding money per user. It will only get more expensive as data center contracts fall through and the investment craze fizzles out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

They love money. AI was good money for a while. Or at least it looked like good money until you looked at it for longer than 3 seconds, which greatly surpasses the average attention span of an executive. And also the average executive's iq.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iltoroargento@startrek.website 22 points 1 week ago

We can only hope this helps kill the fad. I know companies won't be taking any realistic lesson from this, but at least this can force them to abandon a lot of this crap.

[–] aloofPenguin@piefed.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I smell a bubble about to burst...

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago

Im drooling over that idea

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 18 points 1 week ago

All over America, employees are saying "But YOU said..."

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 16 points 1 week ago

Uplifting News

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

So it has a negative ROI and anyone who brought it into their firm is a clueless twat who uncritically bought a sales pitch.

If corporate governance were not a joke, C-level heads would roll.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is why these companies should go bankrupt.

We had a system that works and they thought if they got rid of the actual workforce with the needed knowledge and replace them with lower paid AI retards it would make them more money, fucking karma.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The millionaires following the stupidity of billionaires and wondering why they're not becoming billionaires too.

Give them 50 years and maybe they'll start to wonder why people doing "how to get rich" seminars aren't retiring... And why podcasters telling everyone how to get women seem like such losers.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The first half of the title got me worried...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

What’s this echoey sound? As if someone warned us about this exact fucking thing.

Curious.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (25 children)

I don't really understand how people are using so many tokens. At work I haven't even hit $200 I spend per month. Wtf are people doing with these things that burns so many tokens?

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you run "agentic coding harness" or any kind of goal oriented loop then tokens goe brrrr.

And LLM sellers are pushing for that (duh), as they managed to convince people to use infinite monkeys typewriting until they make Hamled.

(Type made on purpose)

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 11 points 1 week ago

I do it on purpose

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] julysfire@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My company recently converted our PMs into Vine Engineers right after laying off actual engineers. They don't even know what git is or how to use it. 3 of them alone are using $7k a month in Claude tokens and they have not raised so much as a single PR.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

Who needs PRs? What's a branch? It defaults to master and that seems to work just fine!

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Maybe they should get AI to do the AI prompts so they can cut down on costs XD

load more comments
view more: next ›