this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
105 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

86633 readers
3682 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eicker@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

The weird part is that everyone keeps calling it public infrastructure, but if the primary beneficiary is a handful of private AI companies, that argument starts looking pretty thin. Reliable grids benefit everyone. Dedicated power corridors for hyperscalers are a much harder sell, especially when locals bear the costs.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I would use eminent domain to take away the land from data centers and make public parks. I can easily make a case for public parks.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 1 points 59 minutes ago
[–] Zulu@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

You guys have land?

[–] greatwhitebuffalo41@slrpnk.net 21 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely disgusting. Not that they didn't use this as pure racism during the expansions of major interstates through major cities. It's not new. It's just disgusting when it happens.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 5 points 3 hours ago

Let's not forget some parks either!

[–] False@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Eminent domain can be used for a lot of things.

[–] rf_@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

Why can’t we do that for high speed rail instead?

[–] MrSelfDestruct@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

What are you? A socialist!?

[–] False@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

We do. In Seattle at least, it's been used for expanding public transit light rail. The problem is that you still have to pay people for their land that you're taking away - and in a city like Seattle that gets very expensive very quickly. And that's not even accounting for the political cost.

However, if you're in a part of the country with cheap land, then it's less prohibitive to use.

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Because usually in those cases the land belongs to those with means. In this case it'll be those who can't fight back effectively (cause our legal system is designed to favor the wealthy).