this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
33 points (100.0% liked)

GenZedong

5247 readers
72 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] opiumfree@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

people from global north countries that have never known as little as the hardship of traveling with a weak passport when the former colony that had widespread poverty less than 40 years ago, does not cut off from all trade and participation in the global economy so that everybody can fucking Die in squalor and water wars just so they can feel like they do socialism right

[–] RedPartisan@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

It's worth remembering that a significant amount of accusations of revisionism towards China come from Maoist insurgents and other anti-revisionist parties. I'm not saying they are right (I didn't read enough to confidently say they are or aren't), but we should acknowledge that it's not just Western ultras.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

"Anti-revisionists", looks inside: revisionists

[–] RedPartisan@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Literal people's warriors are revisionist?

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Fighting a protracted people's war is certainly admirable, is it the correct strategy in all circumstances? No. Is it the right strategy in the Phillipines? It has a severe lack of results to speak for itself, instead the maoists say China's revisionism is why they're failing. Even if that's the case, why would they still then continue with a PPW that is achieving very little instead of analysing concrete conditions and applying a different strategy that might be more fruitful?

[–] RedPartisan@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 hours ago

I get what you are saying, but you are critiqueing dogmatism. That is a seperate problem. Dogmatism is being closed minded towards newer theory / tactics and strategic retreats. Revisionism is the abandonment of class struggle and integrating into bourgeois politics.

[–] TankieReplyBot@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 day ago

I found a YouTube link in your post. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: