Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
With the obvious caveat that I'm not a lawyer and this is my opinion - The only way this makes any sense to me is if Luigi wants to become a martyr.
There's no way he's going to get any sort of leniency - he killed a wealthy person. The search, Luigi's arrest, and the trial have all been a performative farce; an attempt to dissuade anybody else from getting the same idea. They aren't going to stop just because he pled guilty.
They straight up say that in the article:
“Mangione attempted to send a public message through violence, but the message that emerges today is very different,” McDonald said. “Violence is not a legitimate instrument to promote any political or social message, and those who resort to violence in an effort to advance their beliefs will be prosecuted.”
Violence is not the answer!
But also we want to seek the death penalty.
“Violence is not a legitimate instrument to promote any political or social message, and those who resort to violence in an effort to advance their beliefs will be prosecuted.”
So about ICE...
“Violence is only for us to use. You peasants don’t get to use it against us.”
If we ever get our Nuremberg trials, then yes ICE.
So about our healthcare system that condemns you to death for the crime of having not only too little money for treatment, but too little money for the profit margin...
Unless they are the government, of course.
“While the defendant pled guilty, our office does not have a plea agreement with him,” the U.S. attorney said. “There are no accommodations or concessions, and we are free to seek the maximum penalty under the law.”
There wasn't any plea deal in place, he (in consultation with his lawyers) probably figured this was the best path for him to possibly not get a life sentence. It's as simple as that.
Whats the maximum for stalking? That's what he plead guilty to right?
For federal stalking, up to life in prison.
The big thing with this plea though is that NY state has a double jeopardy law. If the federal case is resolved first (which it is with this plea), the NY murder case gets dropped under double jeopardy since the charges stem from the same action.
The reverse is not true though. If he went to trial and the state case progressed, he could be convicted of murder at the state level, and then still for these charges at the federal level. SCOTUS has held that charges in different jurisdictions, like state and federal, do not violate the double jeopardy clause of the constitution. Even for the exact same charges.
And if convicted at the state level and federal level, if the federal case ever got overturned on appeal, he’d just go right to state prison to start that sentence. The Feds have supremacy though so he’d go to federal prison first regardless.
This removes the state case.
What are the appeal options after a guilty plea in this instance?
I've seen the stalking charges described as "stalking resulting in death", which I suppose is worse than plain old stalking but not quite murder. Regardless, he's facing a max sentence of life. It seems like he's taking a gamble that he will get less than that.
And as far as I can tell, he is betting they by saying "I killed him" as part of this plea in this trial, he can get out of the state trial.
...why? why do this? the article didn't seem to explain
It's a legal strategy so they can claim double jeopardy for the state charges.
The feds were dumb because they only went after the stalking charges.
Some legal experts expect the double jeopardy attempt to be struck down because of how much popularity this has and we all know courts are easily manipulated by politics and money these days.
You can't claim double jeopardy for duplications of state and federal charges, it's already been settled that because of the dual sovereignty doctrine it does not conflict with the 5th amendment.
Yes you can. It’s a NY state specific law.
The reverse isn’t true, like you state though. This is just specific to NY only.
Pretty sure new york has a law or part of its constitution that prevents this kind of double jeopardy.
That can't be it. You can commit multiple crimes in one act, and state and federal murder are separate crimes (federal involves crossing state lines, or something else that gives them jurisdiction). My guess is it was their last chance for a plea deal.
My guess is it was their last chance for a plea deal.
Except that the prosecutor’s office has stated that no plea deal exists, and they’re still free to pursue the maximum sentence. That’s what makes the whole thing so confusing.
There’s basically no legitimate reason for him to plead guilty at this point, except for “I’m tired of this, just get it over with.” Pleading guilty only hurts his case, and doesn’t help him at all.
so what if the reason is money. what if they are paying him/his family to just make this go away. what if someone offered him $100 million to just say he did it in order to keep us from continuing to talk about him as hero, st luigi, etc…
The prosecution isn't in charge of the sentence though. He is still more likely to get a shorter sentence by confessing and pleading guilty.
New York has a state specific double jeopardy law that would apply here. Charges at the federal level that stem from the same action are double jeopardy is also charged at the state level.
So if he pleads in the federal case, the state charges will be dropped. If he pleads at the state level though, the federal charges still stay.
Really, even though he's pleading to the stalking charges, not murder? They can't try him for that in New York?
NY prosecutors are disputing this. We certainly have not heard the last of it.
Correct. The charges are different, but they’re both for the same action, so they fall under New York’s double jeopardy law.
There’s no federal murder statute, but stalking that results in death is very similar. That’s what he plead guilty to, and it still carries up to life in prison.
But it gets rid of the state case.
No, it’s not. State and federal charges are kept separate, and aren’t bound by double jeopardy. It would potentially prevent him from being tried at the federal level again, but wouldn’t protect him against state charges. And the prosecutor’s office has stated that no plea deal exists, so they’re still going to pursue the maximum sentence.
That’s what makes it so confusing. The only real reason he has to enter a guilty plea is because he’s tired of fighting. Or maybe someone threatened him? But at that point, we’re veering into conspiracy theory territory.
New York has its own state specific law that prevents double jeopardy for cases at the state and federal level from applying.
New York has a law that safeguards against this kind of double jeopardy. By that I simply mean in a broad sense preventing state charges when federally charged. The nuance of how it will work in this case I feel we're about to see get played out.
But what does that do for someone facing life?
He's not facing a life sentence, I think they're seeking 25 years. Which is still rather insane for a first offense, even homicide.
Mangione, 28, previously pleaded not guilty in April 2025 to murder, weapons and stalking charges brought by Manhattan federal prosecutors, but U.S. District Judge Margaret Garnett threw out the murder and weapons charges over legal technicalities in a January ruling, leaving two stalking charges in places.
That ruling eliminated the possibility that Mangione would face the death penalty, though he still faces a possible sentence of life without parole if convicted on two charges: interstate stalking resulting in death and stalking through use of interstate facilities resulting in death.
That's what the judge kept pointing out to him and he said he understood that he could have consecutive life sentences.
We don't know a lot of the details behind the scenes by the defense and fed/state prosecutors there could be more coming out.
My completely uneducated guess is that he and/or his lawyers know hes screwed no matter how innocent, and so the best option is to take a plea deal
Except he wasn’t offered a plea deal. The prosecutor’s office has said that no deal exists, and that they’re still planning on pursuing the maximum sentence.
He didn't take a plea deal.
“While the defendant pled guilty, our office does not have a plea agreement with him,” the U.S. attorney said. “There are no accommodations or concessions, and we are free to seek the maximum penalty under the law.”
If not for the provision against cruel and unusual punishments, Mangione would have absolutely gotten drawn and quartered as a form of public chastisement