this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
-9 points (41.8% liked)

Fediverse

43570 readers
232 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey all — just launched openmic.social, a general-purpose Lemmy instance with a specific mission: open discourse + transparent, restorative moderation.

The pitch is simple — anyone can grab the mic — and the thing that makes us different is what happens when you cross a line:

  • No shadowbans, ever. If your post is removed or your account is actioned, you're told — what happened, which rule, and how to fix it.
  • We help before we punish. A heads-up and a path back come before a ban. Bans are the last resort, not the first reflex.
  • Moderation in the open. Every call is appealable, publicly, in our !meta community.
  • Hard lines only: nothing illegal, no targeted harassment, no doxxing, no spam. That's what keeps the mic open for everyone.

We're brand new, which means early adopters shape the culture. Come introduce yourself, bring a community that needs a home, or start one — I'll help you set it up and mod it.

🎤 https://openmic.social/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

This post about a new Lemmy instance is on topic for this community. You can all have your own feelings about this instance and what it’s trying to do, but a single post here announcing it isn’t spam.

Please stop reporting this post and OP’s comments.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You might have been expecting the response you got here, or you might not have. I know I learnt more about nazi/hate speech dogwhistles in my first few weeks as a Lemmy admin than I had learnt in all my life up to that point 😅.

I also know in those early days there were people worried my instance was a "free speech" instance because I wanted open conversations instead of bans. Mostly I think I didn't appreciate how big of a problem it was, and for sure I had people registered on my instance expecting it was a "free speech" instance. There are people out there looking for a place to spout their hate and many think Lemmy is the place for it because it's advertised as censorship resistant.

Please know that there is a strong belief (among both nazis and anti-nazis) that indicating a place as being able to speak your mind is a dog whistle for allowing hate speech. Over time if you find you aren't attracting the right kind of members, you may need to tweak your wording. But also please know that the idea of supporting people to be better community members instead of flat out banning people does work for many members, because many people just don't realise that what they are saying is harmful. Some people will be operating in bad faith though, and it's typically the same small number of people that keep getting banned. Because you have open registrations, these users are more likely to come to your instance.

It's also important to understand that the Fediverse is full of users that have felt unsafe on mainstream social media. Your rules against hate speech need to be strictly enforced, of you'll find yourself isolated in the Fediverse as no one will want to federate with you.

[–] phil@openmic.social 4 points 6 days ago

Thanks! This is by far the most constructive comment I have gotten and truly appreciate it. I’m learning and always will adjust as needed. I’m open to constructive criticism and more importantly any insight others who have done this can provide. The immediate assumptions about me and my goals were at best amusing and not at all constructive however, somewhat unsurprising to be honest.

Lemmy itself doesnt have shadowbans, all ban logs are public.

[–] the_q@piefed.social 9 points 6 days ago

This either already is or will become a hotbed for rightwing pieces of shit.

[–] spaceracoon@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago

Thank you! Pre-blocking this so I won't have any splash damage my main feed. "Open mic" translates too much on nazi or hate baiting nowadays. Open socials need moderation or become chesspools. I do not hang out with toxic people in real life, I don't understand the principle that "I have to" do it digitally. Hard pass. Good luck!

[–] the_abecedarian@piefed.social 8 points 6 days ago
[–] EmilyIsTrans@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Lemmy already has public ban logs which have reasons listed. I'm not sure what you're really offering here. I think you're being extremely naive and are fundamentally lacking understanding in how oppression and the "marketplace of ideas" functions.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Openmic makes me think there will be audio.

[–] phil@openmic.social 0 points 6 days ago

There are development plans

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah, it's a shame, "free-speech" gets abused by bad people and it can't be the scope for any platform. I could imagine it being used for other purposes as well. For example I always wanted to run a Piracy community that doesn't remove links or tutorials on how exactly we do it. But that probably also crosses the lines. ...Some other Robin Hood activity... I mean it could be used for good as well, depending on perspective.

Great, wish you the best, but if anything gets illegal is federated to mine that's where I have to defederate. One admin to another wish you luck though.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Caught in some loop, the content warning just keeps popping up when I click Continue. Or maybe my phone is trying to protect me.

[–] phil@openmic.social 1 points 6 days ago

I’ll have to take a look and see if I can figure out why that is and resolve it.

[–] phil@openmic.social -1 points 6 days ago
[–] phil@openmic.social -1 points 6 days ago

Thank you! Don’t hesitate to reach out if I am missing anything, I definitely don’t want anything illegal happening. I am looking for more mods and admin a to help out as well! Appreciate the kind words!

[–] phil@openmic.social 0 points 6 days ago

Haha careful on the “marketplacr of ideas” that moniker was claimed by Gettr. Ask me how I know.

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 53 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It has been my experience that “free speech” (especially online) is code for “bigotry welcome”.

I see nothing in the description here to convince me this will be any different.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 week ago (10 children)

So, transphobia, racism, misogyny, all acceptable as long as it's aimed broadly, and doesn't become targeted harassment of an individual?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So if I wanted to start a pro-nazi community there, you would permit that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anzo@programming.dev 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Lemmy has bans, no shadowbans. There's no recommender algorithm to make the "shadow" part. Or mod tool to edit votes. I believe you are using incorrectly the term. Please clarify. A ban is a ban. Shadowban is no ban per se, but from there on you post to /dev/null in whichever platform has support for that shit (i.e. meta)

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Lemmy most definitely has shadowbans, but they are applied at the level of whole entire communities rather than end-users. I remember being on the StarTrek.Website instance when that functionality was added to the Lemmy code, and discussing with someone my finding out that ChapoTrapHouse was no longer accessible from it, despite the fact the instance remained federated. No announcement of that fact was ever made iirc, it's just that one day poof the behavior has changed, after Lemmy deployed a version that allowed for that.

Some few instances are very open about their hiding of communities - see e.g. https://legal.programming.dev/docs/hidden-communities/, listing in detail every one - but most are not, and the Lemmy UI has nothing at all like the list that it shows for (de)federations.

The Lemmy admins also can remove people even from the modlogs, in cases of severe abuse. Tbf it's exceedingly rare and there is little evidence of this being abused (well there was one time, but the excuse that it was due to a bug seemed believable to me and most everyone else - Lemmy.ml quite often tests new versions of the code before they get rolled out to the rest of the Threadiverse, which is quite helpful actually).

Lemmy also fails to notify someone of their having been moderated. The various communities are FULL of stories of people asking where their posts went, or why they can no longer post to a community, or stating their discovery that they have an event in the modlog. The notification of moderation activities is exceedingly poor on the Lemmy platform.

Sadly, Reddit does a much better job at notification of an event, and also provides for a modmail to communicate with the mods to discuss the situation, e.g. to ask why, rather than leaving it to the end-user to wonder if they should DM each one listed in sequence until they find one that is even active much less responsive...

Lemmy is imperfect. At least Huffman is not in charge here, but conversely the tools have aways to go before we catch up even to what Reddit offers.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›