this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
704 points (99.3% liked)

politics

24357 readers
3495 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“As a Christian, I don't think you can be both MAGA and Christian,” one person wrote in the comments of the video.

Two weeks ago, Jen Hamilton, a nurse with a sizable following on TikTok and Instagram, picked up her Bible and made a video that would quickly go viral.

“Basically, I sat down at my kitchen table and began to read from Matthew 25 while overlaying MAGA policies that directly oppose the character and nature of Jesus’ teachings,” she told HuffPost.

In the comments of the video ― which currently has more than 8.6 million views on TikTok ― many (Christians and atheists alike) applauded Hamilton for using straight Scripture as a way of offering commentary. Others picked a bone with Christians who uncritically support Trump.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)
  1. MAGA = Inhuman.
  2. Lives are saved by supporting this nurse in getting her fellow Christians to stop following MAGA twats.
  3. Now isn't the time to dilute her impact by debating the pros and cons of various beliefs. We have a facist to beat.
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 4 points 4 days ago

Most "Christians" have never actually read their own handbook, and just stick with shit they've heard that reinforces their venomous beliefs.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hahahha american christianity is schisming

[–] derfunkatron@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, the schisms have been occurring for like 200 years.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago

More like 500. At this point, they're fractally schismatic.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 19 points 6 days ago (3 children)

the problem with religion, and the reason it should be completely eradicated, is that you can spend your entire life trying to explain how one interpretation of the stone age holy book is "wrong," while the other person does exactly the same thing with you, and there is no valid proof that either side is "right." meanwhile people are killing each other over the whole thing. it's all such fucking bullshit.

it's time for the human species to grow up and stop wasting time (not to mention lives) with religion

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (8 children)

Meh. If social media served a purpose, to me, it was to show just how many dimwits are out there who will beg for someone to tell them what to do and how to act and what to think.

You can take religion from them, but they won't stop being gullible and lost, and they'll just fall prey to the next scumbag with no scruples that comes along, be it a politician or some other con artist.

The problem isn't religion - it's an excuse, a cover.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 days ago

I'm just glad people can tell the difference between Christ and Trump, the beast of revelation

[–] StonerCowboy@lemm.ee 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Religion is a cancer on mankind.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 days ago

I am happily MAGA= I am happily fascist.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

No True Christian
No True MAGA
No True Scotsman

[–] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago

Maga Christianity is be good to people who look like you and everyone else is a demon

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s all Christianity. Whenever Christians act horribly, a different group of christians always come out saying “they’re not REAL Christians “ how convenient. The thing is they ARE Christians, because you don’t need an official membership card to get in.

It’s a cop out to brush away these people as not one of you, but they are. These are the dregs of your religion, this is the end game to certain branches of your religion. You don’t get to brush them under the carpet and pretend they don’t represent you , cause they do. Own these people and fix your religion which often leads to this. Don’t just keep pretending that this isn’t part of Christianity

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

It's the No True Scotsman fallacy. Sorry, a plurality of Americans are megachurch evangelicals. Their leadership is in bed with MAGA, which makes them complicit.

[–] damdy@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago

I read about this story today and looked her up. Why do so many people watch her content? I genuinely couldn't get through more than 30 seconds of anything she's posted. Not that she's a bad person, and I hold nothing against her personally, but it's just utterly uninteresting to boredom. Like photos of food but of people.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

There isn't a meaningful difference between the most moderate Christians and the Accelerationist Doomsayers, the only difference is the random person who controls the flock and what ideology they force on the group.

But if this gets idiots to shame religious people for falling for con men hopefully it does some good?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›