this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
315 points (87.1% liked)

Canada

10115 readers
446 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How to say Marx was right without saying "Marx was right".

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 197 points 1 week ago (16 children)

Let's be clear about something; climate scientists almost universally agree that there is no such thing as "winning" or "losing" the fight against climate change (Suzuki, for the record, is a zoologist, not a climate scientist). This isn't a game, there's no referee, and no one gets a trophy at the end.

The battle against climate change is about mitigating harm. The worse we do, the more harm there will be. But there is never a point where it is "too late". The car is going to crash, but the sooner you hit the brakes, the less damaging the impact will be. Everything we do to push the needle will save lives. There is never a point where we get to throw up our hands and succumb to the comforting fantasy that it's "too late" to change anything.

I have a lot of respect for Suzuki, and I don't blame him for feeling defeated with everything that's happening, but spreading this kind of message is, dangerous, damaging, and flies entirely in the face of the science.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Back before George W Bush directed NASA to call it climate change, it was called global warming, and you can definitely win against that - by stopping the earth from warming. That's unwinnable due to feedback loops that have now begun.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago

Does not remotely address my point. We can always - always - work to reduce the harm caused by climate change.

The point where the harm could be reduced to "none" is decades past us. If that's the point where you give up then fuck off. Climate change is actively causing harm as we speak, and it is still worth fighting. We can still make life better for ourselves and future generations.

The notion that climate change is some kind of runaway engine that will continue amok without any further human input is nonsense. Yes, I'm aware of ideas like "Permafrost methane bombs" and I've also done enough research to be aware that only a small fringe of climate scientists actually support those ideas. They're flashy and exciting and get big press, but they are not widely accepted climate science.

What climate science shows is that the climate actually responds faster to reductions in CO2 than our older models predicted. That means that debacarbonization can have real and meaningful positive impacts beyond what we previously thought possible.

There is real damage already done, and there is damage that we cannot undo, but there is never a point where the problem goes beyond our input. The climate fight is always worth fighting.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Too late" implies civilization collapse to me. That's pretty much guaranteed once the warming we're locked into happens.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

Sort of? I don't think he mentioned tipping points anywhere in there, it was pretty non-specific and ranty, but if we've passed a tipping point it becomes less a matter of applying a brake and more of actively causing massive climate change in the other direction. Failing that, the warming trend and other shifts will stop when the Earth reaches a new balance and no sooner.

Nobody really knows where those tipping points are. The Paris thresholds were our expert's best guesses for a "safe" amount of warming.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

Suzuki is and always was just a mouthpiece for corporate masters. Controlled opposition to steer public opinion. He is not and never will be a climatologist. His message is one of defeat because his backers want us to give up.

Suzuki can kiss my white ass.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Canada (and the world) will burn. You think migrants are a problem now? Wait until millions of people have no choice but to go north and the water wars start.

[–] huppakee@feddit.nl 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

O damn, almost forgot about the water wars. Those were brutal. Before those people genuinely believed there was nothing bigger than a World War. The fools. Like if you're still here in 2125.

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The water wars will start far sooner than that

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] demerara@social.vivaldi.net 36 points 1 week ago

@asg101 I agree we've lost the opportunity and will have to "hunker down". But hearing it from David Suzuki is...hard.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

Fuck that. It's never lost, it's just that we are constantly heading towards worse outcomes.

If we as humanity start taking it seriously tomorrow, it would still be a victory over only starting in a decade.

It's not lost, it's just getting worse, and that should make people want to fight.

saying that the fight is lost is just creating more disengagement and hopelessness.

I like the saying "The best time to plant a tree was 30 years ago, the second best is today." Because it is almost universally true about any long term goal.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the focus on politics, economics, and law are all destined to fail because they are based around humans. They’re designed to guide humans, but we’ve left out the foundation of our existence, which is nature, clean air, pure water, rich soil, food, and sunlight. That’s the foundation of the way we live and, when we construct legal, economic and political systems, they have to be built around protecting those very things, but they’re not.

Powerful truth!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Has been for ages. It's now question of how bad, and we are still making it worse.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I’m sick of this WE, im not a billionaire pumping more Co2 per day with my yacht fleet than a town of people do in their life. I’m sick of being blamed for this shit, when all my conservation is undone in a minute by a corporation. I refuse to take equal blame any longer

[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Good point. I try my best, but even if like 90 % of the population tried harder, it would barely offset the billionaire companies killing our planet.

They're the problem, always has been that way.

I think it's time to stop them.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago

Lol yup, trump also went all in on climate denial. Definitely fucked.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Giving up is exactly where the "too late" come from, quitter shouldn't be leading climate advocacy.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I mean...the next steps involves lots of fire and death...so...that's not going to save the environment either but it will certainly send a message.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks to big corporations effectively owning governments and big politicians the world over, things aren't bound to get better anytime soon, because "the economy". Fuck that shit

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And thank the Saudis too. Guess where the previous conference on phasing out fossil fuel, but agreed to slow down the process, was held.

[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep, Trump just put all our climate mitigation funds into big oil. We’re cooked.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

And Trunp is bringing back coal too. Fucked doesn’t even describe it.

[–] WrathfulBirch@lemmy.cafe 14 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I gave up a long time ago. The last time we really did anything about an issue like this was lead in gasoline. 50+ years of knowing we had to change. I wonder if maybe the wealthy elites know whats coming. I wonder if this new rise in facism is partially an answer to the fact that there won't be enough of anything to go around. That is why they want us having babies. for soliders. I hope they have some spark of humanity and let people self terminate but I bet you would need money for it.

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just wanted to add that maybe the last thing that we did for the environment and that really worked was for acid rain in 1991. At least where I live.

A few years before that there was the Montreal Protocol that banned CFCs and helped to heal the hole in the ozone layer. I think.

But yeah, I don't remember anything of the sort recently,

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] srecko@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

What about ozone layer?

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I'm pretty sure that's what the grab for Ukraine and Trump's stated intent to annex Greenland is about. Both of those have the potential to become food security sources after significant global heating. I'm also pretty sure that's why authoritarians are seizing control of govt (and by extension that govts security services) because there won't be enough to go around and they're going to need soldiers to keep the hungry people away from their billionaire breadbaskets.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mintiefresh@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

🔥🔥 This is fine 🔥🔥

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Saying we have failed is the easiest thing to say.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Because its true?

Barely anything had been done these past decades and the result is that boat loads of people now believe conspiracy crap over the actual truth that climate change will milk us all

I fully expect that even less will be done in the next years so yeah, were screwed

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Doesn't mean it's not the truth.

[–] NeedMoreLimes@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think he's right, but he's also a real asshole and lives in a mansion in Vancouver and likely creates more environmental damage than the average human

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CatherineLily@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago (11 children)

So, how long do we have left?

[–] asg101@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No one knows, many humans and other species are already dying from climate change today. Get used to hearing the phrase "It is happening much faster than expected." from now on.

[–] CatherineLily@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Guess people better start updating their plans then. No point in starting a family and having kids when they'll just die to climate change.

[–] WanderingThoughts 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

People are doing that. Fertility rates are way below replacement rates. Now billionaires are freaking out that their customer base and work force is shrinking.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Collapse is a process, not an event." It's very likely we'll be extinct by the end of the century. There will be all manner of hell from now until then. Our population of over 8 billion is only possible because of a highly complex global web of systems. Complex systems are fragile. Once dominos start falling, people will start starving very quickly.

[–] scintilla@kbin.earth 16 points 1 week ago

Its entirely possible that 99% of humanity dies but I don't really buy into us going extinct. People have an inate drive to survive and even if things are genuinely horrible I don't see them just giving up. Unless there is literally no food/potable water I think the planet is stuck with some form of humanity until the planet is uninhabitable. Remember there are still dinosaurs around today, they just look different.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I try to stay postive but we're slowly burning and yet politics has never been so aggressively stupid about this. And the warlords dictating or culture too. I don't want this.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All that's left is to make the rich suffer.

[–] asg101@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago

“The Earth is not dying, it is being killed, and those who are killing it have names and addresses.”

~Utah Phillips

Inb4 some pedant quibbles that "the planet itself is not dying." Yeah, but we and our fellow creatures are. It should be understood that is what Mr. Phillips meant.

[–] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago

How to say Marx was right without saying "Marx was right".

Hard disagree, this is a liberal doing the usual thing. As John Bellamy Foster elaborates on in his articles and books, the fight against climate change isn't lost, it's been abandoned by the ruling class of imperial core countries. Look up some of his stuff on Monthly Review the ecological rift is a very important concept that never appears in the kind of discourse you're posting

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

1950's oil execs funded studies that show how they will kill the planet if they don't stop, transition to something else, hell they had enough fore warning they could have R&D'd solar and monopolize the tech, but NO! They needed to make faster money faster and stopping yourself from killing the human race isn't THAT important, and they knew they'd be dead by now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Less people accept climate change in Canada today than 20 years ago. If we couldn’t do anything about it then, why would now be different?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›