this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
127 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38611 readers
465 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A recent tell-all book by former Facebook insider Sarah Wynn-Williams, titled "Careless People," is blowing the lid on the sheer depravity of the social media giant's targeting machine. Wynn-Williams worked at Facebook — which subsequently changed its name to Meta a few years back — from 2011 to 2017, eventually rising to the role of public policy director.

As early as 2017, Wynn-Williams writes, Facebook was exploring ways to expand its ad targeting abilities to thirteen-to-seventeen-year-olds across Facebook and Instagram — a decidedly vulnerable group, often in the throes of adolescent image and social crises.

Though Facebook's ad algorithms are notoriously opaque, in 2017 The Australian alleged that the company had crafted a pitch deck for advertisers bragging that it could exploit "moments of psychological vulnerability" in its users by targeting terms like "worthless," "insecure," "stressed," "defeated," "anxious," "stupid," "useless," and "like a failure."

The social media company likewise tracked when adolescent girls deleted selfies, "so it can serve a beauty ad to them at that moment," according to Wynn-Williams. Other examples of Facebook's ad lechery are said to include the targeting of young mothers based on their emotional state, as well as emotional indexes mapped to racial groups, like a "Hispanic and African American Feeling Fantastic Over-index."

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 10 points 20 hours ago

Would you like to buy some mustache wax? You can get 20% off if you buy today! Best twirls you'll ever experience.

[–] Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Every time I read more about Facebooks BS, the crazier it sounds. But I remember having a very similar issue with it. It kept feeding me political content I would get upset with. It was great at that, and so I stopped using it all together.

It truly seems like it's a perfect storm of manipulation.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It's now been 11 years since I left Facebook. 'Tis a silly place.

[–] Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I think I stopped using it in 2014? It was rough haha

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 18 hours ago

2014 for me, as well!

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 13 hours ago

I'm still "using" Facebook, if by "using" we mean subscribing to some groups, sending birthday greetings to old friends, and rarely posting anything. It doesn't feed me political content, any time it tries to push anything controversial, it gets blocked.

I do get political content on Threads though, but that's my choice.