I'd get a Prime membership if I could order one of those, for sure! Go Iran!
MerryJaneDoe
Proton VPN.
I use the paid version, but I'm pretty sure you can get a free version without data caps.
It lets you set the location of your VPN endpoint, meaning that you can spoof your location to just about any country on the globe. Very easy and intuitive interface, works on mobile, and no I don't work for these motherfuckers, I'm just excited to share my experience because I only recently decided to start using a VPN.
Other options, according to Google: PrivadoVPN (10GB/month), Windscribe (10GB/month), and Hide.me
This is perfect, I think! The last thing we need is a unified religious front that's "cleaned up God's house". Much better to have traditionalists offended by Machine Gun Jesus and in-fighting.
In fact, maybe replace Jesus' face with Trump's. Hit 'em with some blasphemy and see which Xians cheer it and which ones look away in shame and second-hand embarrassment.
Article summary: THIS JUST IN: TRUMP LOVES OIL, HATES CLEAN ENERGY
Yeah. We know.
I'm very disappointed that the term "petrodollar" is not used anywhere in this article, because the concept of a petrodollar explains (at least partially) why Trump has done what he's done.
Saudi Arabia has a deal with the U.S. They have agreed to trade only in U.S. dollars. By protecting that deal, Trump protects the U.S. dollar as the international currency of choice.
Any article about the oil trade and/or Gulf nations should mention this. It's a foundation of U.S. foreign policy. And, while it's an underhanded way to exert disproportionate control over global energy markets, it benefits the U.S. consumer greatly. It keeps the value of the dollar high, even as U.S. manufacturing dies.
In a just world, this arrangement would never have happened. But it did happen. If the petrodollar disappears tomorrow, there will be even more misery and hardship for working class Americans. Imperialism should be dismantled carefully, lest the innocent be crushed beneath it.
Poor Rickless bastards.
It's an incorrect/misleading title.
Shatner was mocking people who think new Star Trek is too "woke".
The original Star Trek was known for its very progressive (at the time) themes, and especially for its integrated cast. Don't have the energy to google it rn, but I think Shatner was one of the first white TV actors to kiss a black co-star onscreen.
Nothing personal to you, but posts like this one might be one reason why so many places on the internet are echo chambers.
No explanation, no analysis, no factual data or source. So, if a person unfamiliar with the context (like me) stumbles across this post, the conversation is already over. It just looks like a bunch of tribal finger-pointing (in the sense that this "tribe" is right and another "tribe" is wrong).
Strange that you didn't repost your source(s) here in this thread...
"So you have Tik Tok just smashing our young people’s brains all day long with video of carnage in Gaza"
Funny how that works. Smashing the brain with Gaza, and the Epstein files, and ICE and heretofore unseen levels of financial corruption and on and on.
If the bar gets any lower, we'll need to start digging.
I think there's room for both.
Assembling even a dozen like-minded people for a coordinated protest is out of reach for most folks. What usually ends up happening is that a huge protest happens and everyone goes and then most of them are finished. They did their part.
The big protest ends up being a performative event, for both the protesters and the administration/police. The big protests usually happen on a weekend, so that everyone can attend. Usually in an urban area, where office and government buildings are closed on that day. So you end up with a downtown area packed with police and protesters and nobody else.
And even if you end up with a consistent, long-running, well attended protest, the chances are slim that it impacts anything. We did this for a year in Portland in 2020, and it made no difference. Maybe 25-50 people during the day would hold vigil over the park, watch other people's belongings and just be present. They'd chat with passers-by and make new signs, etc. But when evening came, things would ramp up as people got off their day jobs and came to join the crowd. The crowd would balloon to 5 or 10 thousand people sometimes, but even if it was only 500 or so people, they still had nightly clashes with police. At least two people died that summer.
It. Meant. Nothing. No meaningful change was affected. The police chief and the DA ended up resigning, and there were a few minor policy changes around how to better handle civil unrest.
I'm wondering, though, if we had been in a wealthy residential neighborhood, would things have been different? Probably. But could we get all those people to a suburb? Being in the city center provided all of the momentum. The foot traffic and downtown rush hour, drawing people's attention, that sort of thing. I don't know if that sort of excitement could be generated outside the city?
So..those a bunch of meandering thoughts, thanks for coming to my TED talk. :)
I am ashamed to admit - I haven't worked at all.
I'm so sorry, I didn't realize we were supposed to be working! (Also, I am a ditch digger by trade, and alas, I see no way that my skills could be of service...)