Ninguem

joined 2 years ago
[–] Ninguem@lemmy.pt 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Bolas!

Esta foi resposta no mastodon. Agora esta deve aparecer no mastodon também...

Argh!!!

9
Bicicultura (outraseconomias.pt)
 

Sugestão para quem tiver acesso.

[–] Ninguem@lemmy.pt 1 points 2 weeks ago

Hum... good to know.

I have no experience with hubzilla. Only mastodon and lemmy. And have no idea of how facebook or twitter work.

Lets just hope the fediverse finds ways to deal with problems on the fly...

[–] Ninguem@lemmy.pt 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm afraid you might be right!

What's your theory?

My nightmare goes like this:

  • Some form of spam and plain wrongdoing will emerge with the rise of awareness about this fediverse thing.
  • To cut a long story short: then some form of control will have to be put in place - like spam filters, blacklists, server whitelists and the like - and the hole thing goes the way of the email and the usenet, making it almost impossible to keep a server as an independent hobbyist.
  • Some cleaver provider will offer a free $ervice and enforces the control techniques mentioned above reinforcing its use and closing the circle.

My hope:

  • This thing will "never fly" and consequently only really committed and interesting people will linger. Great!
  • A second best hypothesis is becoming the second best forever - the best place to be, like linux.
  • The fediverse community gets really large and popular and has so many servers and services that it becomes impossible to capture by a single giant player.
  • People will "see it coming" and vote intelligently with their feet refusing the big players and choosing freedom instead. Hahahaha!...
[–] Ninguem@lemmy.pt 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

No, I'm not sure of that. And the idea that it's just a scam is what's bugging me.

[–] Ninguem@lemmy.pt 7 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

That's my feeling as well, but... really? Randal Schwartz is hoping for me to follow him back?! The guy is a legend, I'm no one (literally - Ninguém means "no one" in portuguese).

As @floo@retrolemmy.com said, I can't see a way for it to be nefarious except if it is some new kind of spam. But Randal wouldn't exactly fit in "new people joining the platform without really understanding exactly how following people and following hashtags on mastodon is different than how it worked on Twitter or Instagram."

Bah! I'll just leave them there until they get tired of my boring conversations. 😁

 

On mastodon, I'm starting to be followed by accounts I have no relationship with at all (a famous guy I doubt would ever follow me, a supposed magazine about a subject I never talked about and with a name not really related to the subject of their posts...).

Is this a trend? Is it a strategy to get people to follow them back so they have more followers? Is this the fediverse version of spam?

 

I'd like to progressively rate limit ssh connections by 3 per minute, 12 an hour and 24 a day.

I have these rules that don't seem to be working:

tcp dport 22 ct state new limit rate over 24/day drop comment "24+ a day"
tcp dport 22 ct state new limit rate over 12/hour drop comment "12+ an hour"
tcp dport 22 ct state new limit rate over 3/minute drop comment "3+ a minute"
tcp dport 22 ct state new limit rate 3/minute accept comment "Good SSH"

I'm still stuck in debian 10.13, stock kernel 4.19.316-1 (2024-06-25) and nftables v0.9.0 (Fearless Fosdick).

sets are not yet available, as far as I know.

[–] Ninguem@lemmy.pt 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

NOSTR clients?

Hum!...

[–] Ninguem@lemmy.pt 1 points 1 month ago

Didn't know that.

It will maybe come with time like @azdle@news.idlestate.org said...

[–] Ninguem@lemmy.pt 1 points 1 month ago

O saw that post fly by in the distance some time ago (it's from Fri, 22 November 2024), but only skimmed through it because it was to long for that moment. It still is, so I've added it to my "read it later when you dare" app.

On one hand, maybe Christine Lemmer-Webber agrees with me in the sense that ATProto might end up being somewhat decentralized. The DID problem could perhaps be circumvented. On the other hand, here's a quote from the text that I did like:

When you build architecture that in theory anyone can participate in, but the barrier to entry is so high so that only those with the highest number of resources can participate, then you've still built a walled garden. -- Morgan Lemmer-Webber, (summarizing things succinctly in our household over breakfast)

The quote might argue against my assumption that just having the possibility of owning a (fediverse) server might entice enough people to participate in the ecosystem... just like email, I guess.

Again: didn't read the full article. Only tldred it and presumed the rest.

[–] Ninguem@lemmy.pt 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Maybe, I don't know. I'm not familiar with how ATProto works. But the ATProto is not very "decentralized", is it? Or is it just a case of not many people caring to link their instances to ATProto servers?

Maybe the problem I described earlier?

[–] Ninguem@lemmy.pt 1 points 1 month ago

Also, curation of a collection is not so easy on lemmy - links roth, loose interest, get debunked...

I whish I could have a "folder" on my bookmarks curated by my team at work, another with my family, follow the interests of my significant other(s) - as long as they want to share them with me, of course...

[–] Ninguem@lemmy.pt 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It lacks the Firefox bookmarks integration, I guess... :-)

[–] Ninguem@lemmy.pt 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

That said, I foresee that all of those that now host a shinny mastodon or lemmy instance would not be as many - plain command line, no visuals, boring server stuff is a lot less sexy. But those could just link their instances to a server (they could host themselves as well, of course).

Maybe this is already happening and I fail to recognize it?... How do you host a lemmy instance, for instance? Aren't there "services" supporting your instance?... I honestly don't know.

 

On another post, I shared a thought I've been having. Here's another one:

Would it be possible to create a platform for federated link share and discussion? That's one of the things I really miss - the possibility to discuss, with a group of like minded people, content I stumble upon on the internet.

The image is just another provocation, of course. ;-)

 

I've been seeing these "why not federated " popping up here from time to time, so i figured I could make two suggestions (a suggestion and a question, really) that have been popping up in my mind as well.

Let me ask the question first, in this post, and make the suggestion on another post, to keep the discussion clean:

Wouldn't it be better to have the fediverse be a server only (like mail, or usenet - as federated as can be) and then have clientes like mastodon, lemmy, whatever... be just clientes to that server?

The post would have fields like author, date and time, subject or title, text resume, text content, image, link, video, x, y, z, ... Then clientes would fetch whatever they are interested in (maybe mastodon would focus on author, date, image and text resume, pixelfed on image, peertube on video, lemmy on all of them... a blog would fetch the author, the date, the title, possibly text resume to use as lead, and text content and display that as a blog entry...

Information could, then, just flow via jason, xml (xmpp, why not)

Maybe I'm being naive here, but would very much like to understand why.

Of course the server would authenticate and distribute to other servers and to clientes what they ask for.

The image is a little provocation, of course ;-)

 

Bela maneira de mandar simpaticamente alguém ir dar uma volta.

 

O "português" é tão maior do que aquele falado só em Coimbra ou na capital!...

 

Portugal: és aluno de nível 1. Acorda para a vida!

Dá que pensar!...

 

Ando a receber mensagens da Viaverde a dizer que o meu identificador apresenta risco. Não sei qual é o risco, não dizem, mas suspeito que o risco seja eles não ganharem a "subscrição" a que me querem obrigar fazendo-me aderir àqueles identificadores novos.

A notícia do Expresso, de 24 de novembro de 2024, com o título "Minuto Consumidor: identificador da Via Verde acende luz amarela? É sinal que há problemas" até inicia bem:

"Há várias queixas de consumidores com identificadores de Via Verde mais antigos, que se aperceberam de erros no registo das utilizações."

mas não explica o que se passa nem porque é que acontece nos "mais antigos" (que não tinham subscrição).

A pilha do meu foi substituída há relativamente pouco tempo.

A argumentação da Deco também me parece muito fofinha...

  • Comprar um novo: 37,50€ ou 45€ e só dá para 7 anos (não dá para substituir a pilha, em contraste chocante com o greenwashing da empresa).
  • 12,02€ anuais ou 6,12€ se optar por extrato eletrónico
  • 19,25€ por ano, ou 13,35€ com extrato eletrónico
  • 1,93€ em cada mês de utilização ou 1,43€ se pedir extrato eletrónico (e o identificador? É gratuito?)

Alguém sabe o que se passa?

 

Olha boa! Querem ver-me a concordar com os chagadinhos?...

Proponho que nos apressemos a retirar a casa a “quem vive neste registo de ataque claro à sociedade, que acha que é um revoltado e que a sociedade está contra ele” - palavras do chegadinho à extrema direita - ou seja: àqueles mal comportados que infestam o parlamento ao urros e a sociedade portuguesa ultimamente bem como aos seus capangas que instauram leis marciais e agridem constantemente (às vezes mortalmente, diga-se) quem lhes apetece.

Eu saberia onde ir procurar "tráfico de armas". E não era no Intendente.

 

Porque é que isto me deixa desconfortável?...

Será pela forma como está escrita, como se fosse uma ameaça? Ou há mais alguma coisa?

Então as instituições do estado não são capazes de se organizar para manter uma base de dados coerente e a solução é retirar as entradas dos mais vulneráveis?

Grande oportunidade de negócio para os phishers, também.

Mais que desconforto, revolta-me!

view more: next ›