TheFerrango

You know I'm kinda tempted to link you to a Copilot session with an LLM written apology.

No apology, but do have a nice day.

A baseless answer is a baseless answer regardless of origin though. I'd argue more thought went into getting the LLM to give me an estimate that it would've if I just typed "yeah 600 passengers on a coal train are probably better". But hey, do feel free to hate on LLMs

Too much work for shitposting after work, don’t you think?

Well I don’t know anyone who works in either designing mass transportation nor makes environmental impact analysis, so no one could give me an accurate guess, hence why I specified that I asked.

I cannot express the depth of disappointment i feel here.

I even let it ‘think’ some extra time, come on

I sincerely hope you are never responsible for so much as brunch

I’ll make it my goal to ensure I’m supervising every single brunch you’re going to for the rest of our lives

Copilot’s deep think says it would take a 2K passenger train to be more environmentally friendly than 2K electric cars, given a coal-steam train and electric cars recharged by a coal fired power plant.

But that’s irrelevant, electric cars lose the coolness factor against steam trains. Choo-choo electric drivers!

Glorious coal for scenic steam locomotives. It’s a win-win

You just made drows sexier

Even better, now they have to double check to make sure he didn’t perform tax fraud in the paper copy