blueryth

There's no subtext. This man has no obligation to this law, so “How dare this person follow the law. ;(” isn't relevant. This man is not following a law, he is simply going about his day. He is volunteering, and not compelled. There is no sanctity of law at play here.

But, to play ball, yes. If a person who would otherwise receive punishment were to do this, I would take that into account. That is not the case here.

Let's just ignore whether there's any moral or ethical arguments about legal compliance: What law is this man complying with? This is not a law that governs him. He is volunteering, and not compelled. There is no sanctity of law at play here.

Sorry, I'm a bit too used to the average take everyone has that Steam somehow gets a pass and Epic is the peak of tyranny. Pardon that, I largely agree.

For what it's worth, usually devs use one of a handful of telemetry solutions to track achievements and the like. There's some plumbing needed to hook those systems to a platform like Steam, but it's the same idea for Xbox, PSN, etc.

Most major platforms have the same general pieces on the backend, though all laid out a bit differently.

This is kind of a wild take on the fediverse. If Epic is a megacorp, then what is Valve? I get that fracturing the marketplace could lead to a worse outcome for consumers, but surely praying for benevolent billionaires isn't a winning strategy.

Steam is just as much of a problem as EGS.

That simply is not what people want when they look for information.

Well, except for those who do. The problem is a use case mismatch. I'd argue, if anything, an encyclopedia should contain the minutiae. Unfortunately, there's no huge compendium of brief but accurate and sourced synopsis of the same topics. To be fair, we've never really had one.

I agree with the editors that embedded AI summaries are not a good idea (at the moment, at least). Users can bring summarizers to the data set of that's their want, or someone (maybe even wikimedia) will find a way to provide this in a way that preserves the underlying data's validity. Stripping Wikipedia of its full context seems like a bad idea.

Headscale, for one. This is probably implied as part of one of your above stacks, but let's list it out loud. Tailscale is great and all, but it's downright icky to offload routing of any variety to a third party.

Immich. Turn off Apple or Google's automatic scraping of all photos, keep usability. Even if you're not a photo person, at least some of your users are.

Syncthing is or Nextcloud, or something in the family. This may already be part of your NAS plans.

One of the code forges like forgejo, gitea, gitlab. Even when not a developer. Self hosting involves configuration and if you can get that into text and into a history, it makes things so much easier. Add bells and whistles to your hearts content, but these are good suites for a lot of functionality. Forgejo does have federation on its road map, but it's a while off still.

These are ones I find pretty ubiquitous. There's so many options once you have initial infrastructure. Email, for instance, isn't as daunting as the horror stories make it sound, though not as simple as many hope. My suggestion is to take time and do it correctly. There's a lot of backtracking involved as you learn more, but it's usually worth it. Best of luck!

I’m not wrong

Except for this whole part

Nobody knew about it, nobody is backing it, nobody is leading it, there’s no goals, there’s organization, there’s no coordination, there’s literally nothing

Look, I gave it a pass with your snarky restatements. But this is just gaslighting.

I’m actually active in my the efforts of my local community

Good. Hopefully you're not busy being snide and gaslighting with them.

Let's set aside the ridiculous bad faith restatement aside as just an emotional reaction.

Here are things that are occurring: https://actionnetwork.org/event_campaigns/ice-out-of-everywhere

This is 10 seconds of typing into a browser to attach to a single organization effort. Yet "nobody knew about it, nobody is backing it, nobody is leading it, etc.". You're objectively wrong. You're willfully ignorant. You would know this if you even attempted to look. It's the coldest its been and people are in the streets across the country. Get up, go outside, and find out. And repeating this the futility of it all is exactly how you support the current tyranny facing us.

You seem so frustrated that people are patting themselves on the back for sharing jpegs, yet you sit here doing significantly less than the bare minimum. You are working against it.

Nobody's butthurt here. I'm saying your rhetoric carries water for fascists. And every time you say "it's just facts", you reinforce that in everyone's mind. It's not about winning an argument about how progress gets made, its pointing out how the way speak identifies our politics. Its ok, lots of people agree with you. And more people will be shot in the streets while you'll be correct about how progress works.

I'm saying that the framing of this response is intrinsically reactionary, if not xenophobic. Criminality itself is rare. Americans themselves are vastly more prone to criminality. And the ideals of the American system, for better and worse, are forwarded only by Americans themselves, and not their guests. If this is about public decency, following laws, and participating in the system, then the call comes from inside the house. "Crime should be punished" is the accepted way of the world. There's no point in stating it, we take it for granted as part of the 'civilized world'. For some reason this needs reiterated in the context of immigration, however? Evidence suggests if anything this is of less concern when discussing immigrants, yet it needs restated?

Maybe more simply, it reads, "I don't trust 'em". There's a type of person who says that kind of thing.