bunchberry

joined 1 year ago
[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Someone needs to tell you the truth. There is only so nice it can be worded.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

Not to be rude but if you have no professional background in physics then it is unlikely what you have written is something so groundbreaking that it's going to be stolen. Nothing wrong with writing hobby papers for fun but I think you need to put into perspective what you are actually doing.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING CIVIL WAR IS COMING

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

A double-standard is not inherently a bad thing. It's a double-standard that we allow trained and licensed medical doctors to do operations on people but not bozos without any medical background, but one would have to be an imbecile to say this double-standard is a bad thing. It is indeed a double-standard to not show empathy to people who support industrial scale genocide to themselves be merked while believing we should show empathy to the victims and to people who do not advocate for such things when they die, but it is a good double-standard. It's completely ridiculous to think we should be applying a single universal standard to everyone because people are not all the same.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Bullet-proof vest wouldn't have saved him as he was sniped in the neck. The head is a moving target and harder to hit, which is why the less professional sniper missed Trump, he tried to shoot him in the head and Trump happened to move his head at that very second, and aiming for center of mass can be risky in case they are wearing something bullet proof. The neck is clearly exposed and more stable of a target than the head. The sniper knew what they were doing.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Literally right-wingers 24/7 are praising political violence, calling for the eradication of all Palestinians, glorifying the gunning down or running over of protestors, praising the murder of homeless people, praising the execution of minorities by cops, constantly glorifying the suicide rate of trans people, etc. Literally you can go on Twitter and find any of these right-wing accounts crying about how we shouldn't glorify violence and read their post history and you will likely not even have to go back more than 1 day to find them glorifying violence.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

I have seen so many right wingers post something along the lines of "leftists are so psychotic for being happy he was killed, we should kill all leftists in response!"

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The interference pattern disappears if anything becomes entangled with the which-way information at all, it doesn't need to even be an "observer" (unless you are using "observer" broadly enough that it can include even a single particle). You can replace the entire measurement device with a single particle that interacts with the particles at the slits in such a way that it becomes perfectly correlated with the which-way information that the observer has no awareness of (such as if a moat of dust interacts with the particle because the experimenter did not isolate it well) and that is sufficient for the interference pattern to disappear.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

I have been desensitize to it because my twitter timeline has been flooded with toddlers having their skulls hollowed out by the IDF. A live-streamed holocaust has kind of made violence seem not that abnormal to me, so it comes across as strange when politicians cry about people advocating for violence, when literally most of them support industrial-scale genocide of hundreds of thousands that I see dying on a day-to-day basis. That alone has changed me from a "violence is inherently bad" type mofo to a "I would celebrate if most of these American politicians were [redacted]" type mofo. Why should I care if a person who loves mass murder of children dies? It's called karma.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It comes across to me as they simply lack empathy for other "kinds" of people. If you actually felt the same pain and empathy when watching the video of Kirk get merked, you should feel that a thousand times over when seeing a thousand videos of the IOF massacring children, many sniped in the same way Kirk got merked, and then you should look upon Kirk in disgust for supporting that and dehumanizing the Palestinian people. But the fact is these people don't. They don't see other "kinds" of people different from them as in fact "people." Let's be real, they don't feel the same kind of empathy for Palestinian fathers dying as they do a white fascist dying. They constantly mock the deaths of minority groups like trans people. They suddenly have empathy and demand pacifism and valuing the sanctity of all life when a white fascist dies, but are silent in every other case.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They don't even explain it in physics class. That is kind of the schtick of the Copenhagen interpretation. You just assume as a postulate that systems are in classical states when you look at them and in quantum states when you do not, and from those two assumptions you can prove using Gleason's theorem that the only possible way the former can map onto the latter is through the Born rule. But there is no explanation given at all as to how or when or by what mechanism this transition actually takes place.

Many Worlds isn't much better because they posit that the classical world does not even exist, yet that clearly contradicts with what we directly observe in experiments, so if that is true it necessarily means that the classical world is an illusion, and so then you still have to explain how the illusion comes about, which they do not. Dropping the postulate that there is indeed a classical world also disallows you from deriving the Born rule through Gleason's theorem, and so it then becomes unclear how to do it at all without some arbitrary additional postulate, and the arbitrary nature of it means there are dozens of proposals of different postulates and no way to decide between them.

Modern physics is of the form (1) there is a quantum state, (2) you look at it, (3) a miracle happens, (4) you perceive a classical state, and then you are repeatedly gaslit into believing quantum mechanics is a complete theory of nature and it's impossible for there to ever be anything more fundamental than it and any physicist who thinks there might be, even if they are literally Albert Einstein, is a crank crackpot. They then take on the same playbook as the Christians where when you point out their explanation seems to be logically incoherent, they say, "God has no obligation to make sense to you" as an excuse to be incoherent and making no sense, but just replace "God" with "nature" and the same argument is repeated verbatim.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world -4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

How are you any better than a neonazi? Either you outright support a modern day holocaust or you are in denial of it. I genuinely don't understand how a supposed human being can be so low. Americans in general are just disgusting people all around. Your beloved holocaust-loving candidate also ran on being "tough on the border" and having the "most lethal military in the world." You people are just jingoistic, ultranationalist fascist freaks, completely brainwashed by your state and incapable of having a shred of empathy for others, gleefully cheering at the dismemberment of hundreds of thousands of babies and begging for just more militarization and aggression while your country is falling the fuck apart. Wake up. Normal human beings with a conscience who are not part of your brainwashed jingoistic bubble aren't fine with industrial-scale genocide and endless war just because the person who does it is blue, but I know you brainwashed Americans cannot possibly even grasp that idea because the ultranationalistic brainwashing has rendered you incapable of conscious thought.

view more: next ›