That being said, it should be okay for users to call out an obvious grift, or a “nonsense repo” that’s actually pure slop.
Especially if the disclosure is blatantly a lie, absolutely. I'd also say if you see any indicators that they are lying in the disclosure, its still worthy of reporting - but I would say report and separately message the "why", to limit visibility of seeing those indicators.
Just to point out a few projects that allow AI contributions:
If you want all projects related to AI in a different community, it may be easier for you to start "selfhosted_without_ai" or something.
Your account has not existed long enough for self promotional posts. Please stick around and get to know the community, and post when requirements are met.
@Linchevatel@lemmy.world, the community has provided a clear preference for a minimum account age before advertising a project here.
I would encourage you to engage with the community and get to know them before you post again so it can be met with a more positive response.
Eh, its fine. Certainly better than the "I don't like this so I'm going to report it" approach.
@SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone this comment is not (directly) for you, I just want it in context.
Before you report someone for breaking rule 1, please look a the context. Specifically, the username someone may be replying to.
Its fully open source with no payment required, so it doesn't violate rule 7.
AI disclosure is a new discussion starting this weekend.
Edit: Please take a look at this post here: https://lemmy.world/post/48636804
Due to the rule change (stickied post), closed source / paid software is not permitted without community participation - meaning non self-promotional content.
As all of your posts are either this or a link to your blog, I'm taking this down under rule 7.
I actually do want tagging of some sort, I think its a sensible approach overall. I think its a quick way to identify that your project used AI and people can quickly filter, per your example.
That said, I think that should be a separate item, and I don't want to inundate with stickies either. That was going to be my next "oh look a mod is annoying us with his opinion again" post, but then we ended up seeing a ton of promo content this week. I'm trying to stick to a mod post every week or two so everyone has a chance to see and respond to things.
That said, if you want to get that discussion ball rolling, feel free to make a meta post about it of course!
Offtopic and inappropriate for the discussion.
Edit: AGPL, no paywall, fully approved for posting.
@DepthSight@lemmy.world you made this post right in the middle of a bigger conversation around promotional posts, so be aware that this post may be removed later pending the outcome of that discussion in the meta thread here:
https://lemmy.world/post/48462124/24369166
For everyone else, here is why I'm leaving the thread up:
Here is where I see a potential problem:
By default, DepthSight client nodes connect to the centralized Federation Hub to enable shared community features like verified strategy templates, discussion boards, public leaderboard ranking, and the live global node network topology map.
For those coming here and reporting, please be aware this doesn't blatantly break any rules imo, only the (extremely subjective) rule 2, which I don't think fits for the reasons I noted above. Making a good reference for discussion in the meta.
I think you may be misunderstanding the terminology here.
AI is a general term. LLMs are a subset, as are ML, DL, ANNs, NLP, CV, Expert models, etc.
Today you would define what we have as ANI, where the "N" stands for "Narrow". This is also known as "weak" AI.
What you're referring to would be called AGI, where the "G" stands for "General", where an AI would have a human degree of intelligence. This is pure concept today, and does not exist.
Also on the list would be ASI, where the "S" is for "Super", where the AI in question has more collective intelligence than humanity across all domains. This is purely hypothetical.
But AI has existed for decades. The first application I know of is Dendral, which was created in the 1950s to analyze mass spectrometry data to identify organic molecules. This was what's called an Expert model - basically a lot of if-then statements, and led to things like MYCIN.
We don't need to redefine words here.