ellie

joined 2 years ago
[–] ellie@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

For what it's worth, regarding port blocks, I had relatively good experiences with that with a local ISP here. There's no guarantee, but many ISPs block SMTP to prevent accidental zombie botnets from sending email and not technical users, so by asking might already be enough to show that you know enough about it to be unblocked.

As for the blocks, many spamlists you can get yourself unlisted. But I don't know what permanent range blocks may exist in some systems beyond that.

[–] ellie@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel like downtimes are a badge of honor for self-hosting in some ways. Being more efficient and minimal means there will be slightly less redundancy and that can be a good thing. Perfect uptime to avoid lost revenue during downtime is a capitalist craze, and not how an ecological project should operate.

[–] ellie@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

It causes way more traffic for the DNS server to use a shorter TTL, so yes, it does incur more DNS traffic. In Germany some providers will disconnect you regularly if you stay connected for too long.

[–] ellie@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

understandable. how dare you change your schedule without advance notice to the cat monarchs of the household :-o

[–] ellie@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Some ISPs require changes ever 24 hours and will disconnect you if needed. Also, if you set DNS to cache such a short amount of time that you can react to that in 5 minutes, you will incur way more DNS traffic which can become a problem when your site is busier. Also, even if your DNS TTL is set to a super short value, a web search suggests to me in practice there will likely be downstream clients and networks that ignore it and won't really update in such a short time frame.

[–] ellie@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Even in an ideal DNS setup, you're probably going to have downtimes whenever your dynamic IP changes. If only because some ISPs even force-disconnect you after a while to change your address.

[–] ellie@slrpnk.net 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (16 children)

So - yeah, let’s not press Elon too much.

It seems like he literally enabled a fascist government and hurt tons of citizens with irresponsible firings. He can and still perhaps should be hated for that.

[–] ellie@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

No german ISP that i know of does this, it's awful. One doesn't even offer reverse IP ptr entries whatsoever, even if you had a static IP.

You know, what's kind of encouraging is that I posted something similar to this complaint on reddit, and 100% of the responses were corporate apologia how it would apparently be so much work and so much more expensive to provide a static instead of a dynamic IP, or how routing through VPSes is so much better anyway. I hadn't realized the reddit to lemmy brain drain was so bad, which seems good for decentralized morally good hosting.

[–] ellie@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

Personally, I find it hard to believe that just not changing somebody's prefix all the time would possibly cause so much technical extra effort that any additional fee is justified.

 

(Sorry if this is too off-topic:) ISPs seem designed to funnel people to capitalist cloud services, or at least I feel like that. And it endlessly frustrates me.

The reason is even though IPv6 addresses are widely available (unlike IPv4), most ISPs won't allow consumers to request a static rather than a dynamic IPv6 prefix along with a couple of IPv6 reverse DNS entries.

Instead, this functionality is gatekept behind expensive premium or even business contracts, in many cases even requiring legal paperwork proving you have a registered business, so that the common user is completely unable to self-host e.g. a fully functional IPv6-only mail server with reverse DNS, even if they wanted to.

The common workaround is to suck up to the cloud, and rent a VPS, or some other foreign controlled machine that can be easily intercepted and messed with, and where the service can be surveilled better by big money.

I'm posting this since I hope more people will realize that this is going on, and both complain to their ISPs, but most notably to regulatory bodies and to generally spread the word. If we want true digital autonomy to be more common, I feel like this needs to be fixed for consumer landline contracts.

Or did I miss something that makes this make sense outside of a big money capitalist angle?

[–] ellie@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I honestly thought this was a real headline before seeing the source.

 

I've read rumors in various places that another Pi 500 version at a separate price point with perhaps an SSD slot might be in the works. Also, obviously there would be another RAM tier to use, if there were ever to be a version targeting power users.

But does anybody know if anything concrete for these rumors ever showed up? Was there ever any confirmation whether such a different tier Pi 500 is even being thought about?

Sorry if there was news and I just missed it.