fukhueson

Calling for the murder of Jews = antisemitic. Doxxing doctors who have nothing to do with what's going on in Israel = antisemitic.

This is normalizing hatred towards Jews.

And reliable.

Since reading might be hard:

Overall, we rate the National Post Right-Center Biased based on story selection that favors the right and High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact check record.

Which gives the attackers license to be physically violent against those they disagree with?

Odd double standard.

https://apnews.com/article/maccabi-tel-aviv-amsterdam-violence-protests-palestinian-bcea212281f682098c4c77ef552af5f1

Israeli fans were assaulted after a soccer game in Amsterdam by hordes of young people apparently riled up by calls on social media to target Jewish people, Dutch authorities said Friday. Five people were treated for injuries at hospitals and dozens were arrested.

Tensions had been mounting in the Dutch capital over Israel’s campaigns in Gaza and Lebanon, even before Thursday night’s Europa League match between Ajax and Maccabi Tel Aviv. Amsterdam authorities banned a planned pro-Palestinian demonstration near the stadium, and video showed a large crowd of Israeli fans chanting anti-Arab slogans en route to the game.

Afterwards, youths on scooters and on foot crisscrossed the city in search of Israeli fans, punching and kicking them and then fleeing quickly to evade police, Amsterdam Mayor Femke Halsema said.

In Telegram groups, she added, “there is talk of people going on a Jew hunt. That is so shocking and so despicable that I still cannot fathom it.”

If you say so. Mbfc doesn't seem to have a problem with the source.

I treat their statements the same as I've seen this community treat statements from Iran. No problem right?

If only Hamas could have corroborated...

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ynetnews/

Overall, we rate Ynetnews as Left-Center Biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the left. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record. (D. Van Zandt 5/19/2017) Updated (12/08/2023)

I do, I have more than just what not to do, I was hoping you could elaborate on an option other than violence. But it seems you can't.

Before I give you what I think Hamas should do, are you declaring that you have no better option than violence, since that's the only thing we eliminated? Unless that is, you advocate for violence.

I trust that when you say "fight" you don't advocate for violence, considering we just eliminated that one option, correct?

In which case, I'd love to hear what you think that would entail.

In your opinion, what do you do? I've narrowed it down for you by 1 option.

Not do what they did.

https://theconversation.com/gaza-war-blaming-israel-for-october-7-hamas-attack-makes-peace-less-not-more-likely-223934

Evidently I didn't condom Israel in a post about Hamas.

Edit: bias is showing, y'all :) entertaining to say the least.

It's not justification, it's a reason?

Justification:

the action of showing something to be right or reasonable.

Reason:

a cause, explanation, or justification for an action or event.

Reasonable

based on good sense.

~~I won't be responding to you anymore.~~

Edit: I'd like to document here (for myself mostly) how simply posting an article critical of Hamas' actions is considered by members of this community as justifying violence.

Also because I think it's funny considering the discussion chosen in the comments, FTA:

“Atrocities do not justify atrocities,” Sawyer said. “To stop the endless cycle of abuses in Israel and Palestine, it’s critical to address root causes and hold violators of grave crimes to account. That’s in the interests of both Palestinians and Israelis."

In other words, how I know the other two didn't read the article without saying they didn't read the article :)