pleiades

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 hours ago

Nice try, FBI

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Looking at examples online, it is surprisingly easy to understand! I can see it being better than Esperanto for romance language speakers specifically, but it still seems to me like Esperanto would be a better auxiliary language due to the simpler grammar rules and no fixed word order

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But at what cost?

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

TBH I don't know much about other auxlangs/conlangs besides Esperanto. What makes you prefer Interlingua?

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If you mean "is Esperanto English", the answer is no, they're pretty different, Esperanto combines elements of latin and slavic languages. If you mean "Isn't English already an auxiliary language", the answer is also no. English is a lingua franca, not an auxiliary language.

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago (9 children)

Reading through this thread really makes me wish Esperanto or some other auxiliary language caught on

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago

They're just voting with their dollars, it's real democracy!

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm having trouble finding the actual place in the video where he said that, but IIRC his argument was that the bourgeoisie have likely already made their way into the CPC, and once China becomes more powerful than the US, they will go more "mask off" with their activity in Africa since they won't have any competition in terms of making trade deals and agreements. China also clearly has more leverage than the African countries they do business with

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wow, I've seen you everywhere across lemmy! Thanks for the response, but I feel like there's a mismatch in how we define socialism. I've been using "worker ownership of the means of production" as my definition and I feel like the state being controlled by a communist party does not necessarily fit this, since what's stopping the state and bureaucracy from becoming its own ruling class (or being used/infiltrated by the old bourgeoisie), given it holds all the power? Doesn't the existence of private property whatsoever automatically contradict the fact that workers own the means of production? That's why council communism and direct worker democracy seems more appealing to me, although I guess it hasn't had the chance to be tested like leninism/vanguardism. The other thing is, it makes sense to me that public property can exist in capitalism, and that this is called mixed economy or social democracy. However, is vice versa really true? If private property exists in socialism, that means that there is a bourgeoisie, and if there is a bourgeoisie, it's in their interest to undermine the power of the proletariat, and they will slowly chip away at workers' rights. Haven't we reached social democracy, but with extra steps? I doubt that socialism "contains elements of capitalism and elements of communism" in the way you mention, socialism seems to me an entirely independent economic system with communism as its most developed stage, where the only elements it has in common with capitalism is the existence of the state and money. TBH, I'm still processing @pcalau12i@lemmygrad.ml 's comment, it feels kind of mindblowing lol

(Sorry this comment is kind of sloppy, I'm tired right now)

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Part of the issue is that I don't know what news I can trust. Obviously mainstream western news is going to be biased against China, but I don't know where to learn about China in a way that stays "neutral" I guess, since I feel like reading Chinese media will only show me the good side of things, the same as any country's news would do.

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This might be a good point to ask, why are ultras (and trotskyists, etc.) so universally disliked? I'm still learning the history and differences between all the groups of marxists, but surely having discussions and debates with people more skeptical of AES will allow those projects to find/fix their contradictions and improve themselves? Are there any other channels I should listen to over S4A?

[–] pleiades@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

Very interesting comment, thank you! I guess there's still a lot I need to learn about Marx's predictions

 

Like the title says, I'm new to Marxism and have only read a couple works relating to socialism. I don't think I know enough about Marxism to firmly define myself into any "type" (although council communism sounds pretty interesting.) Second Thought and Yugopnik are what got me into Marxism, but more recently I've been listening to Socialism For All's audiobooks and reaction videos while driving. In his reaction video to The Deprogram's China Episode, he makes some interesting points about how China could become "social imperialist" and succeed the US/NATO as the new imperialist global hegemon, among some other things. From an outsider's perspective, I don't consider the current China socialist because of the fact that private property and many other capitalist elements still exist within it, but I do appreciate how much it has been able to develop over the past few decades, like poverty reduction and massive infrastructure projects that wouldn't be possible with typical liberal democracies. People excuse the private property and "restricted" capitalism as necessary evils until China has the conditions to create socialism, but I have doubts about whether China's still even working towards socialism or whether the Chinese proletariat actually hold power over the bourgousie. China doesn't support communist movements internationally, and the liberalized economy has gone on far longer than the NEP in the soviet union despite both being created for the same reason, and I can't seem to find a good reason why it's lasted this long. (I also have concerns about privacy and the fact that access to the outside internet is restricted, although that's not really related to this topic.) I'd stumbled across this reddit thread a while ago, and while I know reddit isn't the best place for serious discussion, I think that the person in the video does make good points, as do the people in both the r/TankieTheDeprogram and r/ultraleft threads and I honestly don't know what to think or who to take seriously in that discussion. I would appreciate if anyone could give me a genuine response to these concerns, thanks.

Edit: Thank you all so much for the responses! I've learned quite a bit reading them, although I haven't had a chance to check out the links people have sent yet. I'll try to update this post with any new questions and respond to comments whenever I have time.

view more: next ›