raven

Well, that's not how gaming works. Those 5.7 million games installed in your laptop mean nothing. Gaming is a passion for a specific game and its further additions. For example, if I love a game called "Test Game", and then they released "Test Game 2", then "Test Game 3", I am gonna play all of them. And when "Test Game 4" comes out and I find out that I cannot play it because SONY wanted to be an @$$, all those other games installed in my computer are just useless .exe files because SONY broke my chain of story progressions and experience with a game. We don't play games to increase the count of games installed in our computer, we play games for the love of gaming and certain games feel like home for that love. Just installing any random .exe file without a meaning to increase the count of games installed and laughing at a steam library makes no sense for a gamer. Digital hording and gaming are different things.

ChipotleGPT 😂

Maybe that's why the government never makes certain vaccines mandatory, especially those that prevent communicable diseases.

And there's a talk going around about single-player campaigns won't come to PC, they'll be PlayStation only.

I love the idea, maybe bricking the device may take some time but something that blasts weird audio on the phone or opens 100 tabs of weird websites on someone's phone?

Yea I have seen that happening. 😂

LOL! yea I did it just now. 😆

I once saw someone sending ChatGPT and Gemini Pro in a constant loop by asking "Is seahorse emoji real?". That responses were in a constant loop. I have heard that the theory of "Mandela Effect" in this case is not true. They say that the emoji existed on Microsoft's MSN messenger and early stages of Skype. Don't know how much of it is true. But it was fun seeing artificial intelligence being bamboozled by real intelligence. The guy was proving that AI is just a tool, not a permanent replacement of actual resources.

I would not want the honey from Resident Evil anywhere near my breakfast.

So what's the point? Its a win-win drivers and passengers both right? Because the male drivers also face problems like threat of a false accusation, vomit in the car, cancelling ride in-between and not getting paid or being robbed.

A friend of mine used drive a cab for a company that took night shift employees from workplace to their homes. He was allowed to use that cab as a taxi in off time, so he did that to make some extra money. A hardworking man with a good character. He got a ride from a nightclub to some hotel or some place (I don't recall that). He does not drive anymore, he left that job and has started some other work. Not all men are bad, and not all women are good.

The passenger was so drunk that she couldn't even get into the car by herself. So he helped her into the backseat and then he started driving. She cancelled the ride mid-way and when he asked her to get off, she attacked him from backseat and threatened him with a false accusation. To his good luck, the guy had a two-way recording dashcam in the car, that he used to save himself.

Male drivers probably want that too. Especially the drunk women.