skidicarus

I don't disagree with you at all. I think the corporate class ought to be held responsible. However, I'm not a fan of individuals being the judge, jury, and executioner. Part of the power of the Nuremberg trials, for example, was the exposing of evil and proving the individuals were tied to it. It would've been quite different had the Allied forces simple shot the Nazi leaders dead without any sort of trial.

I mean, the guy did plead guilty lol.

Always good to give more access to software. I have no use for it, but I very well could in the future.

I believe so, yes. Other to a the well-documented issues that arose from the information problem, Vivek Chibber has done some recent work on the incentive problems that also plague Soviet-style command economies. https://confrontingcapitalism.substack.com/p/why-soviet-style-planning-fails

Not only does it make sense from a global perspective, but it also makes sense economically. China would still be in the gutter if they didn’t have market engagement. The USSR, for example, failed dramatically at trying to have a strictly command-based economy.

I’ll wait and see which way the Democrats decide to go. If it’s another “come together, let’s bring back bipartisanship” deal, then it’s a waste to cast a blue ballot.

I’d wager the vast majority of people in the military are glorified pencil pushers. Not really much of a moral difference between them and the person stocking store shelves with the products of exploitative, unsustainable corporations. Just as there’s no ethical consumption under capitalism, there’s also no ethical form of alienated labor under capitalism.

The same was said in 2024. And 2020. And 2016. And every election before that.

True. We all have to make our way in the world. Rarely is it the way we’d like.

For most people it’s still about material benefits. The guy in office doesn’t really change that.

Those escapes are often drugs. Also, the military is one of the most difficult.