tired_fedora

joined 1 week ago
 

Device-level ID but unchecked bots are the digital equivalent of the Amazon wage cage: The fragile human meat sack must be contained to survive an internet landscape optimized for machines.

[–] tired_fedora@lemmy.ml 17 points 21 hours ago

So it begins

[–] tired_fedora@lemmy.ml 2 points 21 hours ago

See it in 2 months wherever you get your memes 😎

[–] tired_fedora@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Can we normalize tldrs under bot posts please?

[–] tired_fedora@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

If Chromium becomes incompatible with privacy, the only real and broadly accepted alternative is FireFox. Which implementation, and as always in these kinds of discussions, that depends on your threat model: On desktop, I am very happy with LibreWolf. Mullvad Browser is also great, especially with Mullvad VPN, though it breaks pages a little more often than LibreWolf. On Android, I am quite happy with IronFox.

[–] tired_fedora@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Most probably a later addition to this myth, but there is a bemusing, historically stable, and well replicated correlation between stork breeding pairs and human births (1). On a per settlement level, this is commonly attributed to the number of chimneys as typical stork nesting places ≈ number of households ~ births. On a per area instead of a per city scale, I don't know of any confounders that are quite as obvious; maybe industrialization as a confounder of the area of undisturbed wetlands as stork feeding grounds and an increase first of child mortality and later of sex ed. To be clear, I can't exclude that medieval or early modern demografers already spotted at least the aforementioned city level correlation, as it's strikingly clear and stable, but I highly doubt it's the origin of the myth. 1: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg26635482-600-the-uncanny-stork-baby-correlation-that-really-is-for-the-birds/

[–] tired_fedora@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago

While generally wary of broad public firearm ownership for self defense, there must be equal rights for everyone, even if I don't think the current rights regarding gun ownership are the right kind of rights. This is especially true in a clear case of self defense, as portrayed. I hadn't heard of this movement yet and I gotta say: That's helluva fire name and logo!

[–] tired_fedora@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

Thanks for the tip. Did not know. e/os is not Graphene but definitely an upgrade! There are also other companies selling pre-Graphened smartphones, but they are not fair. The reason I suggested a formal fairphone - graphene collab is that I trust Fairphone, as a company, to mean well, and I trust GrapheneOS, as an operating system, to be particularly privacy friendly. (and also as a slight slight at the fairphone - graphene feud, which I find just so sighs).

 

Dear fairphone team, wouldn't it be awesome if you developed your next fairphone with GrapheneOS in mind, ship with GrapheneOS as standard OS, or at least have that as an option? The privacy-conscious crowd and the eco-friendly tech crowd have so much in common! You enjoy immense trust, which would be a great anchor for eco-friendly people to join the flock of privacy-conscious phone and internet users. On the other hand, it could serve as an anchor for privacy-conscious people to get into the societal and eco-friendly tech market; instead of throwing their money at Google for homebrew-Graphene'd Pixel phones.

Hopeful, tired_fedora

PS: I know there was this whole thing about GrapheneOS and fairphone snapping at each other about update cycles but it's time to move past that and forge a productive collaboration for the common good. This could be the beginning of a beautiful friendship. dances off into a field of tulips

[–] tired_fedora@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago

Second this and adding: Fiduciary responsibility and how US economic law places it above all else. Other jurisdictions, particularly in Europe, require companies to balance multiple responsibilities, such as towards their workforce, societal, ecological, and yes, fiduciary, too. It doesn't solve all issues and can be vague AF, but at least well-meaning CEOs can fall back to these other corporate responsibilities in court while the same CEO would be sued into oblivion by US shareholders.

[–] tired_fedora@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

I'm not ideologically opposed to people earning money with their unique ideas and artistic execution. Creative work is work is work. But I don't think that IP should be the gift that keeps on giving three generations after an authors death. IMHO, the public has a reasonable interest in works remaining available, that's why the "maintenance / out of print" clause. Writing good code is authorship. It's only natural the same rules apply, though I wouldn't be principally opposed to applying different time lines, e.g., 5 years for unmaintained proprietary code vs 20 years for books, to reflect the uniquely fast pace of software development vs the more long-lasting beauty of traditional art and literature. Of course there would need to be some very careful wording to define maintenance (e.g., in respect to which platform? What about versions of the same software) and to prevent on-paper continued availability of books at an inappropriately increased price. However, I believe the law makers and the courts could handle this medium diff if there was political will.

[–] tired_fedora@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, how about we shorten that to a cumulative 10 years out of support / maintenance / print or after the death of the author / artist, whatever earlier. For software, a five years out of support threshold would honestly be preferable but I'll be generous.

[–] tired_fedora@lemmy.ml 36 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Software that is not actively maintained for a certain time should become public property. The same goes for books or music that go out of print for so long. "you want to sell me your original product? That's cool. You don't wanna do that anymore? Alright, but no need to bury it in obscurity."

 

Hi there. I'm looking for advice to improve my online privacy while browing on android. I'm currently using vanilla Firefox, strict enhanced Tracking protection (fix major site errors), HTTPS-only mode, default dns, no technical data collection, delete cookies / cache / page data on quit. As extensions, I use only Decentraleyes and uBlock extensions. However, I heard vague warnings from the privacy community about using vanilla Firefox with self-hardened privacy-conscious settings, because my settings and yours might be sligthtly different, introducing entropy that can be used for fingerprinting. The only browser I recognize by name on F-Droid is LibreLynx Lite, which is barely customizable (e.g., no 'decline cookies' or 'delete cookies on restart' setting without subscribing to pro) and was last updated 7 months ago. People on the web recommend 'Mull for android', but that was last updated in 2024 and is not on F-droid anymore. I am not generally opposed but a little candid about using Brave or DuckDuckGo Browser, as these are built on Chromium and I would prefer to stay within the Firefox ecosystem. I am also naively a fan of 'hiding in the crowd': using a common browser / what looks like a common browser to a web page being more private than using a super niche one.

Any well-supported security-hardened Firefox forks on Android to speak of? Any other recommendations?

Thanks for your thoughts.

view more: next ›