El Chisme

506 readers
9 users here now

Place for posting about the dumb shit public figures say.

Rules:

Rule 1: The subject of a post must be a public person.

Rule 2: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 3: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 4: No sectarianism.

Rule 5: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 6: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 7: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 8: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
26
27
 
 

linky

linky to vatican

On President Trump’s decision to rename the department from “Defence” to “War,” the Holy Father said, “We hope it is just rhetoric.” He noted that it demonstrates a style of government “that uses force to exert pressure,” and added, “We hope it works, but that there is no war; we must work for peace.

we hope it works

hope it works

28
29
 
 

DM me

30
 
 

i cant include a picture because she is overly verbose, and the replies are even worse with their weird word choices, wow so literature, such words

Emma Watson went on a podcast and made a comment about how she wishes people who disagree with her could still love her, or something, ya know mummy issues and all that jazz

there's an article about it here from TheAge.com https://archive.md/T6C0Q


I'm seeing quite a bit of comment about this, so I want to make a couple of points.

I'm not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should hold these days.

Emma Watson and her co-stars have every right to embrace gender identity ideology. Such beliefs are legally protected, and I wouldn't want to see any of them threatened with loss of work, or violence, or death, because of them.

However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right - nay, obligation - to critique me and my views in public. Years after they finished acting in Potter, they continue to assume the role of de facto spokespeople for the world I created.

When you've known people since they were ten years old it's hard to shake a certain protectiveness. Until quite recently, I hadn't managed to throw off the memory of children who needed to be gently coaxed through their dialogue in a big scary film studio. For the past few years, I've repeatedly declined invitations from journalists to comment on Emma specifically, most notably on the Witch Trials of JK Rowling. Ironically, I told the producers that I didn't want her to be hounded as the result of anything I said.

The television presenter in the attached clip highlights Emma's 'all witches' speech, and in truth, that was a turning point for me, but it had a postscript that hurt far more than the speech itself. Emma asked someone to pass on a handwritten note from her to me, which contained the single sentence 'I'm so sorry for what you're going through' (she has my phone number). This was back when the death,removed and torture threats against me were at their peak, at a time when my personal security measures had had to be tightened considerably and I was constantly worried for my family's safety. Emma had just publicly poured more petrol on the flames, yet thought a one line expression of concern from her would reassure me of her fundamental sympathy and kindness.

Like other people who've never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she's ignorant of how ignorant she is. She'll never need a homeless shelter. She's never going to be placed on a mixed sex public hospital ward. I'd be astounded if she's been in a high street changing room since childhood. Her 'public bathroom' is single occupancy and comes with a security man standing guard outside the door. Has she had to strip off in a newly mixed-sex changing room at a council-run swimming pool? Is she ever likely to need a state-runremoved crisis centre that refuses to guarantee an all-female service? To find herself sharing a prison cell with a maleremoved who's identified into the women's prison?

I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women's rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges.

The greatest irony here is that, had Emma not decided in her most recent interview to declare that she loves and treasures me - a change of tack I suspect she's adopted because she's noticed full-throated condemnation of me is no longer quite as fashionable as it was - I might never have been this honest.

Adults can't expect to cosy up to an activist movement that regularly calls for a friend's assassination, then assert their right to the former friend's love, as though the friend was in fact their mother. Emma is rightly free to disagree with me and indeed to discuss her feelings about me in public - but I have the same right, and I've finally decided to exercise it.

https://xcancel.com/jk_rowling/status/1972600904185483427

31
 
 

Holland said that years earlier, after two of her close friends had their first child together, they became so deadlocked on the name issue that they refused to complete the birth certificate. More than a week passed without them being allowed to leave the hospital. With insurance refusing to cover the extended stay, Holland said, the couple's medical bill totaled more than $300,000.

Fortunately, Holland had Humphrey, who tinkered with variants of Priscilla until she uncovered a middle name the couple could agree upon: Lily. The impasse ended minutes before Holland's mandated discharge time.

small excerpt from yahoo

32
33
1
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by plinky@hexbear.net to c/gossip@hexbear.net
 
 

linky

text of vance nonsenseVance: So I think in a lot of ways the Democrats and the media, because they so hate the idea of a real border, are engaging in a kind of blood libel against ICE agents.

34
 
 

Holy shit, that's pathetic. There aren't even going to be any big elections anytime soon.

35
36
 
 

https://archive.is/6CWk7

spoilerDogecoin, a meme-based cryptocurrency created on a lark more than a decade ago, is now available to investors through the US public market.

On September 18, investment fund management firms REX Financial and Osprey Funds jointly launched a dogecoin exchange-traded fund (ETF). The launch marks the first time that US investors are able to bet on memecoins—which serve no purpose and promise no utility—through a traditional brokerage, without handling crypto directly.

ETFs are designed to track the price of an underlying asset—whether metals, gold, or crypto. Loosely, for every dollar invested in an ETF, the operator stockpiles a dollar’s worth of the asset, earning a fee as a percentage of the fund’s total value.

“If you ignore stablecoins, dogecoin is the sixth largest [cryptocurrency] by market cap in the world,” Greg King, CEO and founder of REX and Osprey tells WIRED. “It’s really just following the demand that’s already out there in the native crypto space and providing access via a regulated vehicle.”

The extent of that demand is evident: With a first-day trading volume of almost $18 million, the dogecoin fund performed better on debut than many other ETFs launched in the US this year, according to James Seyffart, ETF research analyst at Bloomberg. “People obviously want to trade it,” says Seyffart.

But it’s less clear whether the arrival of memecoin ETFs is a net positive for the investing public. The purpose of capital markets is to create a more efficient means of funding endeavors likely to return value to society, some analysts contend, and memecoins promise nothing of the sort.

“I still don’t really understand why a memecoin should be in an ETF wrapper to begin with,” says Bryan Armour, director of ETF and passive strategies research for North America at investment research firm Morningstar. “Something started as a joke with a Shiba Inu as its character—why should that be a part of capital markets?”

Before regulators at the Securities and Exchange Commission approved the first US-listed bitcoin ETFs in January 2024—only after the courts had forced the agency’s hand—members of the crypto industry had fought for more than a decade for permission to package coins into funds.

However, since Donald Trump returned to the White House, the US government has taken a far more permissive stance towards crypto, instructing prosecutors to deprioritize certain crypto-related offences, passing crypto-specific legislation, and appointing a crypto czar to oversee policy strategy. The SEC, for its part, has retreated from numerous lawsuits against high-profile crypto firms.

The dogecoin ETF launch last week coincided with the release of a new ruleset by the SEC that will allow issuers to bring crypto-based ETFs to market without seeking specific permission on a case-by-case basis. “By approving these generic listing standards, we are ensuring that our capital markets remain the best place in the world to engage in the cutting-edge innovation of digital assets,” said SEC chair Paul Atkins. “This approval helps to maximize investor choice and foster innovation by streamlining the listing process and reducing barriers to access digital asset products within America’s trusted capital markets.”

Though REX and Osprey did not launch the dogecoin ETF under the new ruleset, instead taking an alternative route involving separate legal provisions to ensure it won the race to market, analysts expect the SEC’s new listing standards to tee up a proliferation of crypto ETFs in the US. Under the ruleset, any crypto coin already listed on a market—like Coinbase Derivatives—that participates in the Intermarket Surveillance Group, a network of organizations that monitors for fraudulent activity, would automatically qualify for the ETF treatment.

“It’s a spaghetti cannon. They’re going to cook up all these ETFs—whether levered versions, inverse, or pure spot exposure—and they’re going to frickin shoot this cannon at the wall and see what sticks,” says Seyffart. “That’s what these ETF issuers do.”

Before the approval of bitcoin ETFs in 2024, proponents argued that they would create a valuable avenue for both laypeople and financial institutions to invest through a regulated vehicle in an asset marketed as a digital equivalent to gold, a hedge against inflation, and so on.

Whatever the merits of the bitcoin investment case, the argument for memecoins is shakier. Typically modelled after a celebrity or popular internet reference, memecoins generate no revenue or cash flow, so their price depends entirely on caprices of the public mood and the vibes among investors. In the case of dogecoin, the supply of coins is even periodically diluted. “With a memecoin, it would be hard for a financial advisor to feel comfortable buying that for a client,” says Armour.

One’s stance on the prospect of memecoin ETFs coming to market in droves might depend on personal politics.

“I’m very much libertarian in the way the SEC should be operating…The SEC’s job is not to be a merit regulator. Its job is to be a disclosure regulator,” says Seyffart. “I personally don’t own or trade any memecoins and probably won’t own any memecoin ETFs. But it’s a free market. People can do what they want.”

Others, including Armour, believe it’s the joint responsibility of regulators, issuers, and investors to ensure that public markets aren’t polluted with assets likely to inflict large and sudden losses. “Does the SEC approving putting it into an ETF make people who don’t know what these things are think they are more legitimate?” asks Armour. “It pulls more attention and assets towards speculation, which typically is not a good long-term strategy for investors,” he claims.

The SEC declined to comment.

In King’s opinion, moralizing over which assets should and should not be stuffed into an ETF is besides the point; the government has defined what is permitted. REX and Osprey “primarily view it as providing access to investments that already exist,” says King. “[If there’s] investor demand, it’s something we’ll consider launching.”

In January, REX and Osprey filed for permission to launch ETFs for a variety of other crypto coins, among them a memecoin promoted by Trump. The TRUMP memecoin has been roundly condemned by critics as an unethical money-grab that opens up a potential vector for bribery.

“We just play by the rules,” says King. “The lines have been drawn…by the administration.”

37
 
 

blacks-rule

38
 
 

https://xcancel.com/TheoVon/status/1970692062090797341#m

Theo Von is part of the Joe Rogan sphere. Earlier this year, he performed for Donald Trump at a US military base in Qatar.

39
 
 

Tweet

Live Trump reaction

40
41
1
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by HarryLime@hexbear.net to c/gossip@hexbear.net
42
 
 

https://xcancel.com/DHSgov/status/1970251208322621530#m

There are several tweets following which depict deported people as Pokemon cards.

This is possibly a reference to Asmongold saying that he wanted to go on an ICE raid dressed as Ash Ketchum earlier this year.

https://xcancel.com/Disinfo_Tracker/status/1932138416369496362#m

https://www.newsweek.com/homeland-security-migrants-pokemon-2134008

43
1
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by plinky@hexbear.net to c/gossip@hexbear.net
 
 

in the chotiner interviewer titled Can Liberalism Be Saved?

Well, the next time someone brings up a terrible anecdote about Cambodia or Vietnam, I will definitely drop the Star Wars story to show that people have two sides.

Yeah. And I get those who think you shouldn’t be friends with someone who did terrible things. I hear that. I can just say that he was, as a very large number of people would say, though many fewer would say it publicly, an extraordinarily generous friend.

Professor, thank you so much for doing this.

Great, thanks. If we go light on the Kissinger part, I wouldn’t complain, because it could dwarf everything else.

linky to lib yorker

44
45
 
 

One could never guess what's their mission statement is

text of tweetADL is deeply concerned by the decision of a number of countries to prematurely recognize a Palestinian state outside the framework of direct negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians.

This decision fails to require the release of the 48 hostages still being held in Gaza and the dismantling of Hamas as preconditions — effectively rewarding Hamas' terrorism and those who seek to undermine Israel’s security.

ADL has long supported a mutually negotiated two-state solution. However, this process requires direct negotiations, not unilateral declarations, as this only emboldens extremists and creates even more obstacles to future peace.

Beyond these immediate concerns, we know that one-sided rhetoric related to Israel and the conflict can create an atmosphere which adversely impacts the security and well-being of global Jewish communities.

linky

46
47
48
49
50
 
 

https://xcancel.com/RapidResponse47/status/1969870768201777180#m

rapidresponse47 is an official US government account. why did it tweet this?

view more: ‹ prev next ›