this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
245 points (99.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3148 readers
879 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
simsymbiote@midwest.social
Type1@midwest.social
245
Republicans block vote to release Epstein files (www.newsweek.com)
submitted 1 week ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/usa@midwest.social
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The matter made its way into the political discourse as the House Rules Committee considered the issue, after a failed attempt by the Democrats to force a vote in Congress on whether the Epstein files should be made public.

As one of the oldest standing committees in Congress, the group's key role concerns the flow of legislation to the House floor.

Khanna's amendment was in effect a procedural measure that was tacked on to the GENIUS Act, which relates to digital assets such as crypto currency. If the amendment had been passed, it would have forced Attorney General Pam Bondi to publish the Epstein documents on a "publicly accessible website."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SleepyBear@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What I really wanna know is....the last we heard from the government on this the Epstein files "didnt exist". So they just voted on whether or not to release files that may or may not exist? (I know they do and this is classic fed gov lying about what information they have). But why lie about the existence of said files only to turn around and have a vote on if theyre to be released publically?

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago

the government

  1. These are different silos of information within the government. One demanding that the other release the information that they have.
  2. Congress could demand the DOJ release of the pee tape, the identity of any and all the reptilians in government, or photographs the moon landing set; it doesn’t mean that any of those things exist, or that the DOJ has access to them.
  3. The files exist. Everyone agrees on that. What the Bondi claims is that a client list does not exist, even though she said the client list was on her desk a little while back. She is now trying to ret-con that she meant that “the files” were on her desk, not a client list specifically.