this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
311 points (99.1% liked)
/r/50501 Mirror
1172 readers
1008 users here now
Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I dont think it disagrees with me. The jobs being replaced were not able to be filled by local workers.
H1b workers are cheaper for a variety of reasons. Once local worker market is exhausted and employers search overseas the demand supply equation changes, the US has the highest paying jobs generally so what is a 15-30% before rate salary in the us is a high salary overses. There is the clause that these workers must be paid within the averages of their position and there are examples of companies breaking that. Thats an enforcement issue and not reflective of the program.
I don't think Bernie can make the claim that h1b program steals American jobs without also making the claim that low skill immigrants steal American jobs and I dont think he'd make that claim. The h1b at least has conditions on finding local talent first.
I havent been able to find good stats to Compare h1b salaries vs the roles and I dont find glassdoor to be reliable. I'd guess that for dev work there is probably a ton of the core devs working locally on big salaries and the h1b workers are being brought on as temps for specific projects so their salaries are below the average for what that company pays for devs overall.
According to.....? There is no requirement saying that the companies must attempt to place jobs locally beforehand.
Yeah..... But the most common occupation listed is for it/computer science which is a already a highly saturated labour market. There are plenty of highly educated and experienced locals to hire from, companies like amazon just don't want to shell out the money they were spending when people were aggressively headhunting during the pandemic.
But the DOL is responsible for enforcement and the program. How can it not be reflective of the program? This study goes into depth explaining how corporations take advantage of H1b to harm the labour market.
No, the rule is that it must match the "prevailing wage" which is the average amount of is the basic hourly rate paid on public works projects to a majority of workers engaged in a particular craft. Public work is usually significantly lower than private work.
"The two lowest permissible H-1B prevailing wage levels are significantly lower than the local median salaries surveyed for occupations. The two lowest H-1B wage levels set by DOL correspond to the 17th and 34th wage percentiles locally for an occupation. This translates into salaries that are significantly lower than local median salaries—17% to 34% lower on average for computer occupations (which are among the most common H-1B occupations). H-1B employers can reap significant savings by selecting one of the two lowest wage levels instead of the Level 3 wage (the median, or 50th-percentile, wage) or the Level 4 wage (above the median, at the 67th percentile).
Companies are hiring them from 3rd party outsourcing firms as a cheap labour pool, not as temps for specific projects.
"Outsourcing firms make heavy use of the H-1B program. Half of the top 30 H-1B employers use an outsourcing business model to provide staff for third-party clients, rather than employing H-1B workers directly to fill a special need at the company that applies for the visa."