this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
619 points (90.6% liked)

Fediverse memes

1497 readers
131 users here now

Memes about the Fediverse.

Rules

General
Specific

Elsewhere in the Fediverse

Other relevant communities:

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Apologies to the mods.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 months ago (39 children)

Criticizing Marxists on a community that is federated with the largest Marxist-aligned instances will indeed result in a struggle session.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago (38 children)

Not criticising marxists, just tankies.

[–] Astra@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

What's a tankie, and what's wrong with the .ml instance? I just joined it because I read that it was hosted by the people who created Lemmy, so I figured it'd be the best and/or least likely to go down

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Nothing's wrong with .ml people just like drama.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hi there,

lemmy.ml has a slight problem of removing pro-ukraine and anti-china posts. It has a high amount of what are called "tankies". These are communists who believe authoritarian regimes were great. (nothing against communists in general);

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Exactly this. Like someone will post an article from RT saying that Ukraine grids up babies for fun. If you ask if RT is really the best source you get a response like “RT cites its sources. If you don’t believe it you can read the sources!!”

If you mention that the sources aren’t reliable or question anything you get sealioned hard.

I would recommend making an account on any instance not ending in .ml or bear.net That way you can have actual conversations without having to wade through the nonsense.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

They will also argue terminology instead of addressing the points you raise.

load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)