ALoafOfBread

joined 2 years ago
[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Damn. You're right. Those journalists were sneaky slipping in this quote and not challenging/clarifying it:

“We took a 13,000-year-old tooth, and a 74,000-year-old skull, and we made puppies,” Lamm told The Debrief.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I was thinking this was bs - like they just bred a big, wolf-like dog and called it a dire wolf. But no! They took genetic material from dire wolf remains and made dire wolf puppies! Wow. That's pretty wild.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because we have an extremely strong propaganda machine enforcing the status quo and are also a very geographically dispersed country. The news media in America has a long history of under-reporting protest movements here.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

Maybe they could try an unpaid internship to get experience first

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People in the US often misunderstand what sorts of speech can be "free". There's plenty of restricted speech in the US - hate speech can intensify the sentencing on crimes, libel and slander are both punishable civilly, speech that directs or is likely to incite "imminent lawless action" (e.g. yelling fire in a crowded theater - that is actually the legal reason for why you can't do that if there isn't a fire).

That doesn't even begin to cover the sorts of speech that are heavily suppressed by the government and media but aren't legally restricted - like how the media chooses not to cover large popular protests sometimes (famously, the antiwar protests around the invasion of Iraq/Afghanistan), or gives disproportional representation to counter protesters to give the illusion that both sides are equally popular, or how anti-capitalist stances are generally ignored or downplayed. Not illegal, but if you can't really engage in those sorts of speech publicly, they may as well be.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Just a note that this appears to be an AI generated image. Note the dude up front with an arm coming out of his back. Unless thats a whole jamon iberico that he has stuffed under his jacket, in which case I'd stand corrected.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 256 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Clearly they just need to take their own advice:

  1. No more avocado toast

  2. Stop buying so much coffee out. Make it at home.

  3. ????

  4. Profit.

Simple as.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 30 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

That's a really good analogy.

The email one works too once they realize they've never actually thought about what an email is. Like:

"If I send you an email from gmail, you can open it in outlook, right?" "Yeah"

"That's because an email is just a file that both gmail and outlook can use" "makes sense"

"Can I see your Twitter post on Reddit?" "No of course not"

"But i can see Lemmy (Reddit) posts on Mastodon (Twitter). And these apps aren't owned by huge companies. Normal people run each instance, and the software is free for anyone to use or host."

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 days ago

Oh boy. It's stagflation time

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Russian propaganda is a problem for the US in the same way US propaganda is a problem for Russia. But Russia seems to be much better at it. Basically, all states are engaged in some degree of antagonistic propaganda and that does sometines cause problems - because it is intended to cause problems. Doesn't mean it's the only problem.

view more: next ›