this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
573 points (100.0% liked)

World News

615 readers
646 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person, don't post hate.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

"Oh look, it's couch-fucker," one person shouted in a video shared on social media. Another added, "You gonna fuck a couch, buddy?" As the heckling escalated, chants of "Go fuck a couch, JD Vance!" and "pussy boy" filled the busy train station.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Eh. I’m not a fan of the “couch fucker” thing, because there are a lot of really good (and true) things to heckle him with. We don’t need to make stuff up.

The true criticisms don't bother them: Crony, Grifter, Authoritarian, Hypocrite, Traitor. They wear these true criticisms like badges of honor. Its the pointless, silly, sometimes even fake criticisms (like the couch thing), that really get under their skin. I have no idea why, but it does. So we use those.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fascism relies on the belief that they're the only normal ones. That's why calling them weird was so effective

[–] Cargon@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People should hold their noses and point out his DEI wife. His followers will feel that. She's a class and race traitor so should be given no quarter anyway.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thats a bizarre take. I'm not going to become a racist or use racist language to fight racism.

[–] Cargon@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It would be a recurring performative insult with MAGA as the intended audience to disrupt their resolve. I don't think it has to say anything about your character.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't think attacking someone on the basis of their race or skin color is a problem? You don't think adopting the GOP narrative of taking the abbreviation of Diversity Equity and Inclusion and using it as a slur is a problem?

I don't care that you'd be being racist as an attempt to sow discontent in their ranks. Reinforcing racist views is a bridge too far.

[–] Cargon@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

I think the battle over the real meaning of DEI is lost. I know many organizations (e.g., libraries) have begun to pivot to using different language to achieve the same goals. So the idea of using those three letters against MAGA while it they remain in the zeitgheist is appealing to me.

As for whether performative racism is a bridge too far, I'm torn. I partially agree with you, given it's potential impact on innocents that are exposed outside of the intended MAGA audience. But I don't think it would make us racist in the same way that a soldier who kills enemy soldiers in war is not a murderer. They are a killer, certainly, but not a murderer. Of course, there is a sacrifice of character being made there, but not so much as in the case of the murderer.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It hurts them because their fragile egos makes them feel weak. That's why they all desperately cling to being 'alpha males'

[–] taco@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

I have no idea why

They don't feel bad about ripping off people they see below them. That's part of why they're okay doing it.

Implying they can't get laid is a much bigger insult in their eyes.