this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
914 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

74872 readers
3022 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

LOOOOOLOLOLOL have you looked at China's greenhouse gas contributions lately? They don't give a fuck about the climate, they're just trying to drive other countries out of the market.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Chinese carbon emissions may have peaked this year and they’ve deployed more renewables than the rest of the world combined.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That's because they're also heavily subsidizing that industry out of self-interest. That's the "emerging markets" I mentioned above.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which sounds like a good idea for everybody. Maybe other countries should do the same thing.

I’m no fan of West Taiwan but they’re doing a lot more to decarbonize than most other major economies.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Like always, it's a great idea, right up until China jacks up the prices after they've driven out all the competition and common people can't buy them anymore.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then maybe western companies can finally compete with them despite being ruled by obligate capitalists.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think you may have glossed over the bit about jacking up prices. By then other countries be decades behind in development, not to mention competing with slave wages. There's no way. If there was, they wouldn't be doing it. CCP isn't doing this for the environment, they expect payback.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So the Chinese tech will still be cheaper.

Gee, maybe sending almost all our manufacturing to another country was a stupid fucking idea

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Man I've never seen anyone shift quite so many goalposts in such a short time.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What goalpost did I move? You said they’d be built with slave labor which means they’ll still be cheaper, right? And in the meantime we decarbonize huge segments of the global economy.

Don’t be mad just cause western countries wanted to take advantage of slave labor as usual and are getting bitten in the ass because of their greed, or that West Taiwan is doing it better.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What goalpost did I move?

This one:

Thank you Xi Jinping for saving the climate 🙏

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I never wrote that.

But if a side effect of utterly dominating the west in decarbonizing has the side effect of saving the climate I’m not gonna complain.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I never wrote that.

No, but you did jump into that conversation. If you were trying to have some other argument, you were arguing with a strawman.

But if a side effect of utterly dominating the west in decarbonizing has the side effect of saving the climate I’m not gonna complain.

There is no "saving the climate". There is only China dominating the industry and then pricing them out of the hands of common people, because they have no competition.

Another effect is destroying the global economy and further diminishing the wages of workers in the US and around the world. But hey, maybe you like being poor.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Good. I hate the global economy.

And maybe if the western countries had a lick of sense it wouldn’t end up this way. But we got addicted to cheap plastic crap and let the Chinese leapfrog us.

Because if we’d left decarbonization to the west it would never have happened.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -1 points 1 week ago

Good. I hate the global economy.

I have no response to this.

[–] Amberskin 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are subsiding the deployment of clean energy sources?

Good for them. And good for the world.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org -4 points 1 week ago

Sure, it's great for everyone, right up until it's not anymore because they've erased the competition and then jacked up the prices to the point that common people can't afford them, and further driven down workers' wages in the process.

Is no one else familiar with the concept of Predatory Pricing?

[–] tyra@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh no, a country acts out of self-interest! A concept that is completely foreign to the West 😱 At least their “self-interest“ has cheaper EVs for the rest of the world as a result. What are the coeffects of the US defending their self-interests? Rise in facism? Another genocide?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You're moving the goalposts. You were literally thanking Xi for "saving the climate".

Once again, I am not having a pissing match about which country is better, I am discussing the success of electric vehicles from China.

[–] tyra@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not really? Still saving the climate 🤔

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

At least their “self-interest“ has cheaper EVs for the rest of the world as a result.

It cannot be both. Either:

  1. CCP is subsidizing EVs to "save the climate" and they will stay cheap and subsidized forever because the communist dictator is actually just a totally super nice guy who cares about the global climate.

  2. CCP is subsidizing EVs to dominate the global market, after which prices will go sky high and economies around the world (including yours) will suffer, because they've driven out all of the competition.

Which one do you think it is?

[–] stephen@lazysoci.al 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Amberskin 2 points 1 week ago

Maybe YOU should give another look at those figures.

Specially the ones relative to the % of new renewables put into production during the last years.