this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
375 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
69247 readers
3704 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Very intelligent article in terms of painting a richly detailed picture. Falls short in reality awareness tho.
For example, it's easy for people like the author who are immersed in using information tech to imagine everybody lives that way, but about 2/3 of all jobs still involve working directly with physical objects and materials. Of the 1/3 of jobs that could be done entirely online, only about 1/3 of those actually are. The author mentions that we also interact with our personal lives solely through electronics - to communicate with each other, manage our schedules, our lists, etc - but we used to do most of that on paper. Electronics didn't replace direct interaction with reality, it just replaced paper and pencil.
Recognizing this takes most of the wind out of the author's sails. Silicon Valley, the label they seem to lump modern technology in general under, which most people see as a handful of IT companies, didn't start this phenomenon of insulating ourselves from the real world. We've had telephones and radio for about a century, paper for centuries before that, and all kinds of powered or motorized appliances and other conveniences all our lives. How many of us still have living relatives who ever depended on fire-based lighting or animal-powered transportation, for example?
Anyway, tl;dr I think this article is a fine example of stylishly writing up an interesting and stimulating point of view, which doesn't really have a solid basis but is written well enough to convince many readers that it's insightful.
You make a good point.