this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
150 points (93.1% liked)

Europe

5556 readers
922 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to any of the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
federalreverse@feddit.org
poVoq@slrpnk.net
anzo@programming.dev
EuroMod@feddit.org
150
Europe's race to rearm is pointless if its adversaries are waging war online (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 6 days ago by SleafordMod@feddit.uk to c/europe@feddit.org
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This opinion piece argues that Europe should "shut down recommender algorithms" of the big US social media platforms - Facebook, X, Instagram, etc. - because the author believes that these algorithms are undermining European democracy.

The most obvious example of such an algorithm is on X, where Musk can manipulate the algorithm to boost European far-right parties, like AfD. But the author argues that other social media CEOs, like Zuck, are beholden to Trump's anti-liberal agenda - for example, Trump "openly threatened to throw Mark Zuckerberg in jail for the rest of his life". Therefore: "It is reasonable to assume that tech oligarchs will do what [Trump] tells them", which may include the Trump administration pressuring US social media companies to recommend more right-wing content.

So the author says: "The EU must immediately switch off the tech companies’ algorithms on its soil, at least until they are proven safe for democracy". Do you agree with that?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chrisni@lemm.ee 33 points 6 days ago (3 children)

They’re right. Algorithms are arguably responsible for a lot of the political and social issues that we’re experiencing right now. They’re literally designed to divide us.

What I mean by that, is that these algorithms were built to maximise engagement, so they would promote content based on how engaged (how many ‘clicks’) users would get, but without any other context about the content (eg. Factuality, impartiality etc). It turns out that content that triggers intense emotional responses are the most engaging, so these algorithms would promote emotionally engaging content, and nothing gets people more engaged than outrage and anger. So more and more algorithms would promote content that made people angry and outraged, and when companies and political groups realised this, they latched on to their new found ability to manufacture outrage for their own benefit.

That’s where we are now. Algorithmically driven social media is essentially a tool for collecting personal data, and dividing its users for political gain.

We spend so much time worrying about the impact of AI, that we don’t realise the impact of these things that are already causing massive amounts of damage.

[–] wuzzlewoggle@feddit.org 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's important to note that this isn't a hunch. This has been studied and proven. We know this is happening and nobody is doing anything on a political level to stop it.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago

Thanks for this.

load more comments (1 replies)