this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
683 points (98.9% liked)

Gaming

4097 readers
366 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Valve artist has defended AI disclosures on storefronts like Steam, saying they only scare those with "low effort" products.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Plenty of smaller developers don’t use AI too and we can simply disagree on whether replacing people with ai just so you can make your video game is misuse.

Like is that really even an excuse? I don’t think it’s ok to harass people but if you want to use ai it seems you should accept the social consequences of review bombing given many people do in fact validly see its use as harmful.

Especially when other small developers don’t use it to make games

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Well to be fair for quite a few people it’s either them and AI creates a game, or no AI and no game. Though if it were me, I’d use AI art, put it in early access and use the money on art commissions to eventually replace it. Then again, in this situation I wouldn’t be agaisnt an AI disclaimer.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (6 children)

There's been so much art and so many game produced every year before ChatGPT became big. If not using AI meant that we'll only get slightly more indie games each year instead several times more indie games each year, I think we'll manage without.

There's already more art available than any human could consume in their lifetime. We don't have to push out slop to keep people entertained

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)