this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
29 points (91.4% liked)

Public Health

1699 readers
72 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xep@discuss.online 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Dieting and weight-loss drugs are unhealthy.

Eating an appropriate diet isn't unhealthy, but I don't think you are using the word "diet" in that sense. Weight loss drugs, like any other drug, should be prescribed carefully with great deliberation, after informing the patient and weighing with them the positives against the negatives. Like any other intervention it needn't be inherently unhealthy, but I don't think blanket usage of high dose GLP-1 receptor agonists is a good idea.

Accept your body as it is.

I disagree, we shouldn't accept metabolically unhealthy states as normal.

And, again, we are using weight as a totally arbitrary marker for health with very little real evidence that it is in any way meaningful.

Waist circumference to height is a better marker.

There is so much bunk science in dietetics, it’s unbelievable.

It's all epidemiology. That's the unbelievable part of it, there's no science in nutrition.