338
The new owner of GOG discusses taking on Steam, the devil of DRM, and following in Nightdive's footsteps
(www.gamesindustry.biz)
this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
338 points (99.1% liked)
Games
22880 readers
779 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
GOG needs to fix their client first and port it on Linux. Yes, Heroic is a thing but we do need better handheld compatibility anyway and Linux users, I think, are more likely to be invested in GOG mission.
Theres a reason steam is king... noone else bother putting games on linux, so valve brought linux to the games.
Linux isn't the thing that's driving Steam's profits, tho.
I appreciate what they've done, but no, that isn't the reason they're king. They were king long before any of the Linux stuff.
Or, you could say Valve took the work of thousand of open-source dev and saw an opportunity to turn it into profit. I'm not saying they didn't contribute, but the only reason is because they saw a opportunity to make money, they don't care about Linux.
They absolutely do care about linux... sure, they are profit motivated. But they saw microsoft building their own store, and they saw a future where MS builds a gated garden, and linux was a way for them to preserve their existence.
Newell talked openly about this entire topic at LinuxCon years ago. It’s been 12 years and they’ve been true to their word.
The amount they’ve contributed upstream is insane, and the money they’ve provided to Linux-ecosystem contractors is also insane.
They’re profit motivated, 100%, but at least they’ve done so while being a good citizen in the FOSS movement (bar the Steam Client itself). SUSE, Canonical etc are all for-profit orgs that help push FOSS forward.
Profitability and Free and Open Source Software aren’t mutually exclusive.
I can't understand the amount of energy people spend defending Valve.
I get it, you like video games (so do I) and steam is a convenient platform for transactions.
But, in the end it's just another dirty capitalist business that only cares about one thing: MAKING MONEY. They literally invented gambling for kids, got watch the coffeezila video about it and they take 30% of any game sold while having sub 300 employees. It's pretty much the most profitable business per employee in the US.
They do not care about video games, about linux, about the fact that their home country is turning into a fascist state, and most of all, they don't give a fuck about all the gamers that keeps posting about how great they are. They would change they business model to sell bbq sauce tomorrow if the believe they could make more money out of it. And each time someone points that out, even here, it gets downvoted lol.
I don't think the point was supposed to be that Valve is good.
I think it was supposed to be that it is possible for a profit-motivated company to do something that legitimately benefits the rest of us even though the motivation was their profit goals.
Maybe more of the credit for that should go to the original creators of the FOSS licenses than to Gabe Newell, but it's still nice that it happened either way.
Oh the point always end up being that valve is good amongst gamers. Their asses must hurt from that much free kissing.
No one never adresses the part about valve's gambling system, the fact that you don't own your games, the huge cut they take, etc.
But in theses times, your personal convenience is the only thing that matters, fuck these kids.
Stating facts is not defending. The fact is, if valve didn't invest into the linux ecosystem, gamers would be force to suck MS's dick. Which is far arguable amoung the worst corporation in world. I dont think there has been any cases where valve resorted to anti-competition practices.
Yes, their fees are high. But thats the cost to be publish on their store. They know you aint going anywhere else because they dominate the market. And they didnt get there by manhandling the competition, just the first to provide a product people want, and did it so long that they became ubiquitous, and no other storefront can compete. Gog has the most promise, but they havent even bother with a linux client...
So how about you get off your ass and make a storefront to compete with them?
There has actually been a case going around about Valve forcing price parity despite their official ToS not saying so, with emails from employees to devs as evidence.
I'll admit I didn't read into it though, at most watched a (seemingly pro-Epic) video on it. None of the devs I follow ever complained, but I also can't think of any offering lower prices on other stores (besides Steam key vendors)
They're doing a shitty job at enforcement if your claim is true.
One email from 10+ years ago, and from it's wording the author likely misspoke
Funny you would critizise MS just to then describe steam as a monopoly. Looks like people are now sucking another billionaire's dick lol, just switched from Bill to Gabe lol. I also quite enjoy the "go ahead and build your own store if you're not happy".
I known none ot you will do it but you shoulr watch the coffezilla videos if you want to know who valve really are.
They will delete all these games (that you don't own remember) the day they believe they can make more money selling your mom anal plug, that's just how capitalism work.
Valve uses my money to make the Linux FOSS stack better for everyone, including me. GOG doesn't.
Buying on Steam instead of GOG serves my personal interests.
Conveniently forgeting the part where valve creates a gambling system for kids, as usual. But I get it, the only things that mathers is you.
Do you mean loot boxes in Counter-Strike? A) It's not a game for kids. B) And no, I'm not getting involved with parenting of other people's children, so I actually do not care.
I matter to me, yes.
You should watch the coffeezilla videos.
Linux is where it is because companies that care about making money contribute money to make it better. The same goes for projects like Blender. Linux became immensely more usable for the average user because Valve wanted to ensure that they'll be able to continue making absurd amounts of money in the future regardless of what Microsoft decides to do. The licensing of open source software ensures us that we don't even have to trust them to not pivot to BBQ sauce tomorrow, because the work they've already done will continue to serve us.
I personally have no problem with a profit motive on its face, and the above is why. If you want an easy underhand toss for something to criticize Valve for, it's that their motive for profit encourages them to continue to exploit a loophole in our gambling laws to create a generation of underage addicts. They can simultaneously be the company responsible for breaking down walled gardens and creating a better personal computing tomorrow; and also the company profiting off of child gambling addiction that governments are too slow or too unwilling to do anything about.
What profit? I can guarantee that Valve has spent far more in hiring hundreds of highly skilled full time contractors for 5+ years than they've made from the 3% of Steam's users on Linux.
Obviously it's a long term strategy for them to eventually make money but we've only gained from their investment.
More likely it's a long term strategy not to lose money when Microsoft locks Windows ecosystem to their own store(they tried).
Not OP, but Steam Deck.
I'm a big fan of Steam. They help me keep on Linux, but let's not pretend there isn't a profit motive. Gabe gets yachts, we get Linux Gaming. Win win right now.
Lol, sure they hire "hundreds of contractor" and, obviously, they do it because they like Linux. This as nothing to do with selling steam decks and the upcoming box.
The best thing about GOG is the ability to never use a client or launcher at all. The ability to just download the installers from the website and store them locally means that your GOG games will outlast the following: GOG as a company enshittifies, GOG as a company dies, your account gets banned from GOG, you lose access to your GOG account, your favorite game gets a game-ruining update from its developer, some song license expires and devs are forced to patch or pull the game...
Download them once from the website, store them on a resilient NAS, never worry about your shit getting patched or losing it again.