this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
88 points (97.8% liked)

Gaming

34661 readers
26 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago (7 children)

I bet you bought more slop games than you'd like to admit. This stupidity is boundless.

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Really?

How much did I just win from your bet?

Since I own zero games with slop in them, what we have here is you just you talking out of your ass.

The stupidity is boundless.

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I dont even understand why you would think you know which developer is using GenAI. But keep your hopes up.

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It sounds like you're a keen observer of human behavior, and know more about my purchasing habits and resolve than I do.

By all means, continue to educate me on what I will and will not do, and give me some indicators as to when I will cave.

You can start by telling me down to the cent, how much money I've spent on games on any platform since Tears of the Kingdom.

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I dont understand your reply at all, are you implying you are the developer yourself? Otherwise this sound like a comment aimed at something completely different.

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I dont understand your reply at all,

This is entirely a you problem.

are you implying you are the developer yourself?

No, you're just making things convoluted in your own head.

Otherwise this sound like a comment aimed at something completely different.

Once again, that's a you problem.

The reality is that I made a declaration that I don’t buy slop, you challenged that and implied that I probably have. I then asked you to state which slop-inclusive games I've purchased (or any games since TotK), and then you failed to do so.

Everything following that is you redirecting away from the fact that you ran your mouth with "I bet you bought more slop games then (sic) you'd like to admit.", but cannot name one slop game that i have purchased.

Tl;dr: you wrote a check with your mouth that your ass can't cash.

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

So are you seriously saying you didn't get my sentence as an implication that I doubt your ability to detect AI has been used in a game you bought previously?

I mean this was my original reply and you went into some kind of defense for me not knowing what you bought or will buy. No shit Sherlock.

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 1 points 1 month ago

So are you seriously saying you didn't get my sentence as an implication that I doubt your ability to detect AI has been used in a game you bought previously?

You don't get to pivot.

I said I won't buy slop. You said oh bullshit you've probably bought some without even knowing/how could you tell, implying that I am talking out of my ass.

Produce the evidence that I have purchased some slop, or shut your fucking yip yap.

I mean this was my original reply and you went into some kind of defense for me not knowing what you bought or will buy. No shit Sherlock.

Your defense was to back down from your original accusation, and and attempt to shift the conversation away from that which you couldn't substantiate.

Might I suggest that you just sit the fuck down, as you're too far behind to salvage your initial turd of a comment?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)