this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2026
159 points (97.0% liked)

Firefox

22534 readers
32 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I hope it's just a joke

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ultimately I just need Firefox to always support about:config, manifest v2 compatibility, and userChrome.css and userContent.css.

That said, usually changes like these break my extremely minimal redesign and configs I have on my desktop. So... boo, Mozilla, boo....

[–] flameleaf@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

userContent.css is absolutely essential for me. I use that to limit the size of images on Thunderbird.

[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ultimately I just need Firefox to always support about:config, manifest v2 compatibility, and userChrome.css and userContent.css.

Isn't userchrome.cc already deprecated for quite some time?

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It'd be news to me, I've used the same userChrome.css and userContent.css for years now and I keep my Gentoo Linux desktop up to date with weekly updates, so the Firefox I'm using is confirmed to be the latest version.

Additionally, a quick search on ddg reveals no recent mentions nor plans for deprecation of the feature as far as I can tell.

[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I found this Reddit discussion

The timeline fits (pre-covid), but I got the word wrong. I thought userchrome would've been killed of by now.