this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
942 points (98.3% liked)

Climate

8495 readers
295 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] how_we_burned@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What are you going to store hydrogen in to make this remotely viable? You lose like 60% of hydrogen within 7 days with current tanks and seals.

The new sodium batteries make this completely pointless from a cost and efficiency context

[–] Hypx@piefed.social 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hydrogen can be stored for years.

[–] how_we_burned@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hydrogen’s small molecular size facilitates permeation through many conventional materials, leading to leakage and potential embrittlement of metals. These characteristics create "unique" (read: expensive) engineering challenges.

And if you store it as a liquid that's when you enter the whole cryogenic problem, seeing it needs to be cooled to over - 225c

Even with advanced insulation, liquid hydrogen storage experiences unavoidable boil-off at rates of 0.3-3% per day, creating both economic and safety challenges.

And if you could make hydrogen via electrolysis, even with some uber wunderful unobtanium catalyst then you're still just waiting electricity that we can store far more efficiently in batteries (and with sodium batteries hitting the market there is going to be a huge revolution in battery economics and tech that will make lithium look like a drop in the ocean.

[–] Hypx@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

The problems are mostly solved already. You wouldn't use metals known for hydrogen embrittlement. Often times, you'd use something else, like HDPE or fiberglass that avoids this issue. Storage facilities can even be naturally occurring geological features, like salt caverns.

You would only use LH2 for specific cases, specifically where you are expected to use up the hydrogen quickly. But even this is changing, as self-refrigerating systems are being developed, allowing for very long-term LH2 storage.

We already can make hydrogen via electrolysis. This is a long-solved problem. Efficiency is not that relevant. The main limitation of batteries is that you simply cannot make enough of them. There are huge resource limitation problems. Meanwhile, hydrogen can be made from water and is effectively unlimited as a resource.