Cybersecurity

9964 readers

139 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
No Ads / Spamming.
No pornography.

Community Rules

Idk, keep it semi-professional?
Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kid@sh.itjust.works

Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social

169

60% of MD5 password hashes are crackable in under an hour (www.theregister.com)

submitted 5 days ago by kid@sh.itjust.works to c/cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Wouldn't biometric data be sensor/implementation specific. I doubt the fingerprint data stored on an iPhone is the same as the one stored on an Xperia.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Your fingerprint is your fingerprint. If its possible to extract the raw data, then that can be reconstructed into your fingerprint...

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

in the early 2000s when fingerprint readers started getting popular, my coworker and I decided to test them...

super glue fumes, printer toner and scotch tape. that's all that was ever needed to bypass the reader once you could isolate a good spot where someones finger left a good mark. like from drinking glass or a door knob

I'm not sure if I'd ever trust a fingerprint to fully be a secure passkey

[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I would not trust it as a single factor, but 2FA should always be something you have+something you know, biometeics is more of a "something you ARE", which is unchangeable.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Also I hear you can be compelled by the police to unlock biometric locks.

[–] BorgDrone@feddit.nl 1 points 4 days ago

Fingerprint readers don’t store a raw copy of your fingerprint, to use a bad analogy: it’s like a biometric hash.

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

That's the thing - it's not possible. The fingerprint is only ever stored within the fingerprint module, with no method for retrieval. The only thing the phone sees is "did this person scan a matching fingerprint or not?"

[–] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't think that means it cannot be leaked

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but what would you do with it? Can you convert the bytes to work on any other sensor the victim may also use their fingerprint? Never looked into the real implementation details of the fingerprint hardware.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 days ago

Sometimes you can. Or just bruteforce a colliding pattern that matches to print that instead, because why not