this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
82 points (95.6% liked)

Selfhosted

60093 readers
936 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require your active participation in selfhosting or related communities, or the post will be removed. No more than 10% of your posts or comments may be self-promotional, or your post will be removed. F/LOSS Exception: If your post is about a project that is completely open source & can be self-hosted in full without payment, and your account is at least 7 days old, your post is exempt from this rule as long as you continue to engage in comments.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What to people use and recommend for this? I've read a bit about portainer, but I'm still learning - and don't know what the best solutions are.

Today I have a handful of selfhosted services running on my home machine - mostly installed directly, but a couple running as docker containers. As the scale of my selfhosting has grown, I've realized that things would be a lot easier to manage if each service was run as its own container, so that installed services are isolated.

The solution I'm looking for would make it easy (possibly a web UI) for me to monitor, modify, update, and remove containerized services, including networking and storage.

Edit: Also I would only want a FOSS solution.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] statelesz@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Dockhand is great. I haven't touched Portainer ever since.
https://github.com/Finsys/dockhand

[–] kureta@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Looks nice but what kind of license is that?

[–] valar@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Thanks, what have you liked about switching to this from portainer?

[–] Kupi@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I just recently switched from portainer to dockhand and I really like it. The UI is great and the setup and config wasn’t too complicated. I like that I can put both of my servers into one instance and can update all of my containers from dockhand vs manually. The other thing I like is being able to view the logs for my containers. Idk if it’s a me thing, but whenever I would try to view logs in portainer I would never be able to scroll up as it would update and send me back to the bottom. Again, I could’ve just been doing something wrong, but it always bothered me and I don’t have that issue with dockhand.

[–] Fnaargh@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Uncheck auto update/refresh in top right corner

[–] Kupi@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago
[–] AHorseWithNoNeigh@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago

I concur with the other user: the logs are much easier to access and organized. The compact feel is much more suited to my preference.

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 2 points 1 month ago

That looks pretty good. Looks like Portainer is getting replaced this weekend.