this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
445 points (96.6% liked)

politics

30374 readers
2339 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

archive article https://archive.is/hXQTC

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] almost_genocide@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

As a leftist I have a completely different take.

Obama's campaign made me realize what it was like to have a politician work for my vote. All that "hope and change" rhetoric actually worked on me. Somewhere in his eight years in office I realized he was full of shit but it gave me optimism for the future. That optimism blossomed as I listened to Sanders speeches.

So when Hillary Clinton came along and started setting herself in opposition to Sanders and ultimately defeating him I realized Hillary Clinton and the entire Democratic party think they can just assume I'll support them so long as they run against a Republican who is much much worse.

They're wrong.

Republicans haven't gotten stronger. The Democratic party has intentionally weakened itself because rather than serving the American people they want to serve corporations, Israel and their own egos.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’ll support them so long as they run against a Republican who is much much worse.

As a vulnerable minority (trans) being targeted for active genocide by the Right, I really wish that WAS enough for Democrats to get elected

[–] almost_genocide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

And I'm sure people struggling to put food on the table for their families while watching our government pay for Israeli lifestyles (and their genocide) wish the same from you.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well they're definitely not getting it from the Republicans

[–] almost_genocide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And you aren't getting what you want from Republicans either.

It's time for actual leftists.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A real leftist would prefer incremental change over sacrificing thousands with "Accelerationism"

[–] almost_genocide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A real leftist would prefer incremental change

40 years of "incremental change" and we're worse off than we were before. You need to pull your head out of your ass.

Anyway, everything you say can be turned around on you. A real leftist would prefer radical change over MAGA.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, but radical change would only come with a bloody revolution. You can't vote in the changes you're talking about.You can only vote against fascism

[–] almost_genocide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can’t vote in the changes you’re talking about.

Neither can you.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I can vote in protections for transpeople

[–] almost_genocide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does all the stuff about socialized healthcare, workers rights and affordable housing just not affect you?

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Socialized healthcare and worker's rights would be what you get with incremental change. And I am a worker who intentionally kept her own wages low to stay on Medicaid so it does effect me.

Affordable housing? Gonna have to go full Luigi to get that one. It's just not happening at the voting box.

[–] almost_genocide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Socialized healthcare and worker’s rights would be what you get with incremental change. And I am a worker who intentionally kept her own wages low to stay on Medicaid so it does effect me.

So to be clear you already have socialized healthcare and you're telling people who don't that shouldn't be their priority when voting for a candidate? Do I have that right?

Affordable housing? Gonna have to go full Luigi to get that one. It’s just not happening at the voting box.

What's your housing situation?

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No I'm saying socialized healthcare should be a priority and you will get it if you vote Democrats in

[–] almost_genocide@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's not what you said earlier. Let me jog your memory. You responded to a comment which said:

I’ll support them so long as they run against a Republican who is much much worse.

Your response was:

As a vulnerable minority (trans) being targeted for active genocide by the Right, I really wish that WAS enough for Democrats to get elected

"Forget about families who can't afford their health insurance premiums. Think about meeeeeee"

I'm sensing a theme here.

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, because Trump's attacks on Medicaid and Medicare are getting us closer to Medicare For All!

You're putting words in my mouth.

I never said families who can't afford their premiums weren't important, if Kamala were President, she'd be doing something about it. But she isn't, Trump is, and he's bringing budget cuts to programs already underfunded.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Republicans haven’t gotten stronger.

This is incorrect.

I've never witnessed conservatives rally around anyone like this in my life. The Republican party is currently netting wins they've been trying to get for decades. They own our media. They're violating our Constitution with impunity.

The Republican party is absolutely stronger than ever.

Now, they might be overplaying their hand and that might come back to bite them in the ass, but that's not what's happening right now.