132
Trans people like me are facing segregation now. We need parliament to restore our rights
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
132 points (93.4% liked)
United Kingdom
6722 readers
710 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't like that the r slur has wormed itself back into common parlance, we nearly completely killed it off then suddenly it came back from nowhere
Edit: spelling
How old are you? Pretty sure people have used it for decades, at least since I was in school.
That doesn't make it not a slur?
When I call a someone a cunt it's not exactly supposed to be a compliment.
Do you also call someone an N word?
@Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
This is a much more relevant question.
Cunt and R slur are not even comparable. But n word and r slur are.
I wouldn't order them like that tbh for lest to most offensive. I would put cunt in the middle.
It's that it's very directly targeted at a group of people, would you call someone that's not gay a
Faggot
It's the implications of "this group of people are inherently bad, and therefore my comparison of you to them is an insult"
Faggot is a weird American one so probably not personally but I can easily see context where I wouldn't be too bothered by it's usage
The point ain't the word, it's this:
Also no, it's not American, it's British, they imported it later
It's more that faggot isn't really a word I would use not because it's too offensive to use, but it just seems too American/irrelevant.
With the right context I might use gay as a mild insult.
Ah, so it's just that you're a prick and a homophobic one too, fair
Homophobic gays is an interesting concept
Ah see that's different then my gay brethren, we're allowed to say it cause it applies to us.
35, and they did, then it went away, then it came back
I don't remember it going away. Is that a regional thing?
Possibly, very possibly
I know I noticed it seem like almost overnight a few years ago that a bunch of American places online were suddenly angry about it. But no one in the real world cared. If it's regional in the UK then I would guess London follows the US more than the rest of us?
It sounds like you were just out of the loop to me tbh, and are assuming cause you live in bumfuck-nowhere, where it's like the 80s never left, that everyone else does
Pretty large town but nowhere near London
Maybe we should all go around with stickers saying “gender neutral toilet” and put them over every M/F sign we see
To be fair it says gents/ladies rather than male/female. Or its a picture showing its for people in trousers or dresses. I suspect there is a strong argument for instructions unclear.
They don't want women's toilets to be safe, they just want trans people to die. Trans men going to women's toilets and making people uncomfortable as they are legally required to will inevitably be spun into trans people being dangerous and unavoidably incompatible with the rest of society.
This will allow them to argue for the necessity of queer ghettoes, as people in general use public toilets can not realistically give informed consent about having scary trans people in their spaces.
There may be an intermediate/parallel step where they'll require trans people to give people the opportunity for informed consent. Legally require them announce themselves at the door, to wait for people who don't consent to leave, and to hang up a sign notifying people that a trans person is using this toilet right now. Trans people that want their privacy back are free to move to a ghetto and use the unisex toilets there.
I give it until 2028 before trans people have to identify themselves in public spaces, until 2030 before children are forcefully removed from trans parents, and 2032 before life expectancy in trans concentration camps drops to under 10 years. Unless people left of labor take power electorally or otherwise.
Nobody wants trans people to die. Your post sounds like the ramblings of a paranoid schizophrenic.
I would bet substantial money that your predictions are false.