this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
522 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

86280 readers
2575 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Memory-maker Micron has found a way to keep prices for its products sky-high for another five years, by signing 16 “strategic customer agreements” (SCAs) that include a floor price the company says comes with “a very robust gross margin for Micron, well above our peak quarterly margins in any past cycle.”

Micron CEO, president and chairman Sanjay Mehrotra explained the SCAs in prepared remarks delivered during the company’s Q3 earnings call. He explained that Micron has signed 16 SCAs, most of them covering 2026 to 2030, and that they involve a commitment to buy a certain quantity of product and pay for it in a pricing band that has a floor and a ceiling price. The floor price covers the historically high gross margins mentioned above, and the ceiling price means those who commit to an SCA are insulated if memory prices go even higher.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Isn't that called price fixing, and is generally illegal?

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

its price fixing if the agreement is among 'competitors' - this is price fixing for a customer(s)

[–] Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, but the fine is far lower than their profits here... so, it's only illegal if you can't afford it.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

"Cost of doing business"

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago

If there’s some collusion, sure, but you’d have to find a government body with the will and teeth to prosecute.

Nothing really against charging whatever you feel like outside of things like certain supplies during disasters. It’s shitty

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 11 points 2 weeks ago

Only if regulatory bodies do something about it.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed, it's obviously not related to that concept. Confusing suggestion.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Wouldn’t this just be selling security?

You would enter the SCA if you want to secure your supply chain against the risk of inflated pricing. The risk would now be overspending if the market drops. Comparing the two risk profiles, an organization might decide that they have more stomach for overpaying a set amount over 5 years. As opposed, of course, to the risk of paying an arbitrarily expensive amount indefinitely as the market remains volatile.

So now, while planning out the next 5 years of business objectives, you can plan against a much more solid best/worst case scenario. That minimized uncertainty, which lets the business keep moving even if at a more expense pace.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This is just like selling / buying options in any other industry, e.g farming to buy something at a specified price in the future.

They've agreed to buy XYZ product at 123 time at a price between $100 and $200.

If prices plummet, they've still agreed to buy it at $100 (similar to selling an options $100 Strike PUT), but if prices skyrocket, they don't need to pay more than $200 (similar to buying an options $200 Strike CALL)

Anything in between is just the price, so if it's $150 then its just $150

It's not exactly the same as using options, but the rough idea.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I've never signed a contract to buy something 5 years from now at a certain price.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's a real thing.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

You're not a company dealing with massive inventories :P

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, but it's AI, and Peter Thiel have bought all the politicians he could, so they will let them get away to "gain an advantage against China in AI".

Unfortunately yes, but the current government is not going to enforce the laws