this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
271 points (95.0% liked)
Showerthoughts
42802 readers
193 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.
Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:
- Both “200” and “160” are 2 minutes in microwave math
- When you’re a kid, you don’t realize you’re also watching your mom and dad grow up.
- More dreams have been destroyed by alarm clocks than anything else
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- No politics
- If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
- A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS
If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.
Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You don't have right of way in a vehicle when the light is green - pedestrians still have right of way.
There was no "splash splashy of wheels on the pavement" because the car was in the road, not the pavement.
There were plenty of "splashy splashy" noises around, because there were lots of vehicles. The "bouncy bounce" of rain on that car was easily confused with the "bouncy bounce" of rain of every other car/surface/building/person in the area.
I'm not sure if you're intentionally being moronic, or if you genuinely feel like you know more about the situation of my accident than I do. The fact remains that electric vehicles shouldn't simply be able to make some random noise. They need to be audible and recognisable to prevent accidents.
tell me. how would the outcome of your accident change if you were deaf?
I bet you would be much more observant if you couldn't hear anything.
I'm not deaf.
We're digressing from the original disagreement
I believe it is important for vehicles to sound like vehicles, so they can be easily identified. They shouldn't be randomly changed by their owner to something whimsical.
I don't think so.
your argument is that vehicles should sound like vehicles.
my argument is that it doesn't matter what they sound like, as long as they make a sound.
so I'll ask, what does a vehicle sound like? also, what does a vehicle sound like to a deaf person?
I think vehicles sound like a roaring muscle car screaming down the street. I'm sure you have a different opinion. Deaf people don't care because they can't hear them anyway.
so my point is, it doesn't matter what they sound like because pedestrians need to take responsibility for their own safety by being more observant of their surroundings. you know...like deaf people.
I'm not arguing this absolves drivers from responsibly operating a vehicle.
I'm arguing that it's everyones responsibility to be more observant to ensure safety is a priority.
Big difference between "a roaring muscle car" and Nyan Cat. One of those things is immediately recognisable as an approaching vehicle.
can you not use the Doppler effect and theorize the size, speed, and direction of objects when heard?
"Could you not "/
Sure, whatever buddy. Lets all make things more difficult instead of just agreeing on sensible safety precautions.
You won the pigeon chess match. Congrats.
it's a legitimate question.
I don't get what's so absurd about observing your environment to ensure your safety.
I guess you might be the type of person who burns to death in a burning building because you don't smell the smoke.
do you need to hear the fire in order to believe there's a fire?
It's an absurd question, and if you think it has merit then I can only assume this conversation is going to become increasingly deranged.
I'm clearly talking to an idiot.