this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2026
120 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

87995 readers
2551 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Both creepy and unethical. Way to go.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But also perhaps not very effective, as they only averaged 5 interactions per agent. Not so much that, even for a test project, it seems like these llm agents must not have been very good.

Chatbots have been on dating sites for a long time I should add. Call them what you will, but llm's shouldn't be called AI as far as I'm concerned.

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Yesterday I heard someone who insisted that LLMs were not artificial intelligence and instead suggested the term synthetic intelligence. I get the subtle difference, but what's the point?

[–] undrwater@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I like the synthetic. "Synthetic Language Response" I think is a good descriptor.

The goal is to respond to a query with grammatically correct grammar and adherence to the topic. That seems to work quite well.

"Correct responses"; I've never seen that on the packaging.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I reject any name that includes intelligence. It's not that, they don't think, they work differently.

Many people could make better arguments o this than I, I am not a tech guy. But basically people that know this subject in detail say that it's not thinking, it's not reasoning, it's choosing the most popular response from the bank of responses it holds, and as such, will never be able to get rid of hallucinations as such.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's historical. Pathfinders are AI for example. It's just an acronym for computer doing "brain work".

I mean if you're curious about why we call it that.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

Nevertheless I am calling it LLMs and you all should too. Because whatever computer programmers call it, the public envisions something different that llm's are not when they hear AI.