might needs leeching to work. leeching of nature, leeching of people. sucking out the force of life out of anything.
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
208 points (95.2% liked)
Flippanarchy
2291 readers
268 users here now
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I’m trying to work out the logic in the meme. It seems like it argues against itself somewhat.
A requires B to function
Divided C lowers difficulty of exploitation C. The two lines seems to imply the that exploiting C is required for the functioning of B.
Having something easier does not normally indicate it is a requirement. Typically tha is especially so if there are multiple ways to make something easier.
This meme seems lazy in its argument. But then I’m very very far from a logician.
It is a bit lazy. But it's also a meme and not a thesis. If the purpose is mass communication, resonance is more important than rigor.
More to your point, I don't think capitalism requires racism but it does require some sort of superiority dynamic within the working class. The more, the better. This takes form in misogyny, racism, ageism, ableism, and pretty much any other discrimination you can think of. All will be propped up by the inherent incentives of capitalism in order to keep the attention of the working class off of the business owners actually causing the problems.
Lol you're going to have a bad time looking for logically coherent memes. I think the implied elements here are: Exploitation of C is required for A. Exploitation of C is not possible if C is unified. B enables division of C, therefore A requires B. It may or may not be true but it doesn't hold up to logical analysis (e.g. B is probably not the only way to divide C)
That is much more succinct.
Capital as a singular structure is trivial to spot and the overthrow is achievable. Add in secondary power structures like race and sex and now people will point fingers in a circle before even realizing capitalism is a problem. Now you want to unite people against capitalism? Even harder, they have other problems they view as bigger, more personal.
Inb4 the "but racism existed before capitalism" crowd
I don't see any problem here. Racism existed before capitalism to justify slavery and has a new function after the abolition. In fact, before the abolition, it functioned to divide different oppressed groups, as it does today.
If anything, the meme says that racism was a precondition for capitalism. If capitalism needs racism, of cause racism must be older, otherwise capitalism could not have developed.
I'm not calling the meme a problem. There are people that legitimately hold the position of "racism existed before capitalism, so they have no interplay". Those are the people I'm preempting.
so they have no interplay
Ok, this implication wasn't obvious for me and it truly is a stupid take
I'm gonna go to bed before they arrive. Tell them from me that they suck, please.
What about capitalism doesn't need racism?
Non-Europeans played no role in the European workforce of the industrial revolution and it wasn't less of capitalism because of that. Capitalism works pretty well exploiting just its own ethnic group.
It's less about the specific mode of division, and more about pointing out how division serves the ruling class. That's why intersectionality is important.