As if there isn't already Israeli interference enough, let's make it even easier.
Australian Politics
A place to discuss Australia Politics.
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australia (general)
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
Yes, literally IHRA definition example 6 makes it illegal hate speech for an officer of the law to accuse an Israeli spy of being more loyal to Israel than Australia.
Utterly insane that we have incorporated the IHRA into our hatespeech laws.
Here's the entire list of examples, you'll currently not find it on Wikipedia because a fine editor decided to delete them as "copyright violation" back in mid-2025.. Editors are on the Talk page all agreeing it should be re-added, but as it's a locked topic it seems those with the keys to the article aren't swayed to add them back in. For some reason.
Reading through the list the one that most draws my ire is example 10, "Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis."
Speaking out against the genocidal policies of Israel's current govt: OK (maybe)
Drawing entirely historically logical and evidential comparisons to a mass government extermination event of multiple underclasses of their citizenry in WW2: Hate speech! Go to jail!
Israel features throughout the rules, yet should not be present at all. It is a state, not an ethnicity or protected class... well, it wasn't, until recently.
Interestingly I whole-heartedly agree with Example 11, "Holding Jews collectively responsible for the actions of the State of Israel". Didn't expect to read through that and find any agreeable, although still self serving.
It's a little narrowly focused, but it does remind me of a better general rule.. Geneva comes to mind...
Article 33 - Principle of individual responsibility and prohibitions of collective punishment, intimidation, terrorism, pillage and reprisals.
Maybe they could re-read this example and apply it generally to groups of civilians in the places the IDF invade? Just a thought..
Example 8: Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
These are horribly and purposely conflated aren't they. We've gone from speaking of Jewish people, and transitioned to only refering to Israel without specifically being named. All in a telling example trying to smother Israel's crimes by comparison and deflection.