this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
141 points (98.6% liked)

politics

29322 readers
2179 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wonder if anyone's ever made a fake conversion camp that just lets kids be themselves and hang out.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago

In the middle of nowhere, no phones, no contact with the outside world for a month. Expensive as fuck. Then an intense program of LGBTQ history, therapy, sexual health, financial independence, masking around abusers and how to best protect yourself. With a big fake ceremony at the end when the parents come back, they get the child they wanted at the price they were willing to pay, and the child gets away safely in a couple of years. Everyone's a winner!

[–] Didntdoit71@feddit.online 5 points 1 week ago
[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interestingly I won't be surprised when this specific ruling is used to protect trans rights. A double edge sword if you will.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interestingly I won’t be surprised when this specific ruling is used to protect trans rights

What?

How is medical professionals being able to tell patients false and misleading information going to be used to support trans rights?

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They also can't be forced to lie or provide false and misleading information as well. The ruling even mentions the American Psychiatric Association calling homosexuality a mental disorder as a case where the AMA was wrong. It could end up being very interesting in how lower courts interpret this in the future in cases blocking trans care bans.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's just about words...

Not actually treatements

But that's not even getting into how crazy expecting logical consistency or fair enforcement is...

[–] Didntdoit71@feddit.online 5 points 1 week ago

Just remember...your right to trash religion in all of its forms cannot be constitutionally abridged. Call them all baby-raping goat-fuckers to there faces. Protest there churches. Better yet, crash their therapy sessions with a great big old transgender make-out party on the sidewalk in front of their church. Keep it legal...make them show their true faces.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The U.S. Government never passes up an opportunity to declare people to be property.

Children are not property. Children are people.

The exact same logic that adults can speak toward children in ways that are abusive because those adults are legally allowed to speak is exactly the logic that would say that adults can sexually abuse children because those adults are legally allowed to have sex.

No. When your actions have victims, you are violating those victims’ rights.

And that is true REGARDLESS of what this court of "justices" claims.

The people on this court don’t even know what the word "justice" means, and they have no business being called it.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Trans genocide is on its way and there seems to be virtually no way to stop it

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Free Speech" is not a thing. It's a cute little idea. But even in the most ideal "Liberal" (capital L) utopia speech will always have restrictions.

It's like saying "Freedom of Movement" covers your ability to swing your arm around regardless of who's "face" happens to be in the way.

The lie of "Freedom of Speech" is a privilege of a stable system of governance that is not threatened. Speech is allowed to spread freely and even question those systems as long as those systems are not threatened (Neoliberal capitalism in recent history). But in times of conflict and worsening conditions it will always be used to protect the systems that have power as they become more oppressive.

It is why we use to look down at places like Cuba and scream "they suppress the newspapers!

Yes, they do. Because their system that refuses to allow outside capital to influence their country IS under threat. It's had a blockade of trade for decades. It's an actual threat. And so, in the same way, "Free Speech" is suppressed.

Because the idea of free speech is just that, an idea. It's not something that exists in reality.

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago

Protect Iran's what? Oh, it's the other thing.