this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
186 points (98.9% liked)

Fallout

3349 readers
17 users here now

Welcome to c/Fallout, the unofficially official community to discuss the franchise.

Be sure to check out !falloutmods@lemmy.world, moderated by a friend of ours :)

Join us on https://matrix.to/#/#falloutnewmatrix:matrix.org!

Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. Don’t insult other community members in posts or comments, and don’t make posts designed to insult other community members or parts of the fandom with different opinions.

  2. Posts must be on-topic.

  3. No real life politics. That means no political advocacy, and no real life political discussions vaguely dressed up as on-topic posts. If you want to discuss real life politics, you are free to start your own community.

  4. Posts must be coherent.

  5. If a post is otherwise allowed but has realistic gore or nudity, please mark it NSFW.

  6. Spoilers about newly released official content must be marked as [SPOILERS] with post images blurred and no spoiler information in the thread title. Comments must adhere if the thread OP specified a non-spoiler thread.

PS: Don't use the fandom! please use fallout.wiki for everything instead.

Banner art by Ivan Kalinin

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
rosahaj@lemmy.blahaj.zone
setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world
Agent_Karyo@piefed.world
186
Skyrim and Fallout 4 artist says Bethesda's Todd Howard has too many yes men: "A lot of people were afraid to say no to Todd and that hurt him" (www.gamesradar.com)
submitted 1 week ago by Agent_Karyo@piefed.world to c/fallout@lemmy.world
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

He's a phenomenal person, and is he perfect? No

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A person can be an otherwise good or decent person, and also be a bad or incompetent leader, orchestrater, organizer, conductor, etc.

There's a hell of a lot more to being able to successfully organize and manage a complex artistic and engineering project... than being adorkable.

Being able to recognize when people seem to be hero worshipping you, when you're not getting any kind of constructive criticism or pushback... that is one of the skills a good leader has.

When you do not have that skill, you end up with a toxic positivity hugbox, and you end up out of touch, confused why people seemingly are angry with you for your good intentions.

Its not the intentions people dislike, its the execution.

[–] sleepmode@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Read a blurb that this is apparently why Gabe stopped after Portal 2.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Which is a damn shame.

I need HL3 damnit.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I thought HL3 was because nothing they could do would live up to the hype around it?

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And I think thats just a cheap cop out, because if it was true they'd have never made Alyx, and never retconned the ending via Alyx.

They just don't want to make games unless they have an interesting technology to play with (their words).. and I guess they've found no interesting technology to shoehorn a HL3 story around.

[–] sleepmode@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Maybe we’ll see something when the console drops like we did with their VR set with Alex. But I’m not holding my breath.

[–] fun_times@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Todd Howard saw a scathing critique of the United States' red scare era and thought to himself "this game loves United States ultra-patriotism and the 50's aesthetics".

Yes-men are the least of his problems.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

... you do realize the patriotism etc in Fallout is meant to be tongue in cheek, right?

I'll give you that every new game loses more of that edge and trends closer to venerating it, but we're still well within the satire range.

Everything went to hell because of it. The vaults are almost all horrifying experiments instead of actual shelters... etc.

It sure as hell isn't lionizing patriotism and the attitudes of that era, unless you're only reading surface level deep.

[–] fun_times@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Paladin Danse goes out of character in order to admire the U.S.S. Constitution (a robot-owned ship no less) even though the BoS hates the U.S. for nuking half the world. He then goes on to view Chinese ghouls as evil for being Chinese.

Hancock is not really a charicature or satire of American patriotism. The devs clearly want him to just be a patriot.

The minute men have blatantly nationalistic aesthetics (including their general dressing himself like George Washington). They camp out in the so very subtle "Museum of Freedom".

None of these things are done ironically. These people who live in a world destroyed in equal parts by the U.S. and China should logically hate everything the U.S. was and claimed to stand for. Instead, they constantly brown-nose a country that no longer exists.

Nobody in Fallout 1, 2 and NV (except for the Enclave) would ever consider pre-war U.S. as a force for good or something to look back to with pride. The Enclave are the bad guys for good reasons.

The only actual joke patriotism in Fallout 4 is Moe and his Swatters.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Your two examples of unironically pro-American character consist of a programed synthetic robot and a rotting zombie.

The subtext isn't exactly subtle.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

surface level critique

[–] Newsteinleo@infosec.pub 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I have a guy on my board of directors, I don't really like him, but he in invaluable to our team because he tells me no.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm quite good at thinking about things and responding in various negative ways if you're hiring.

[–] Newsteinleo@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We are looking for people but it's a non profit and we don't pay.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A non-profit?! That's a terrible idea! (J/k)

[–] Newsteinleo@infosec.pub 1 points 4 days ago

You're hired!

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

my board of directors

That's a pretty good collective euphemism for your personalities 😁

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

he [is] invaluable to our team because he tells me no.

Those people are the most important to have on the payroll. Give that man a bushel of added bonus perqs.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The most valuable feedback I’ve ever gotten in my career has been the hardest to hear.

[–] Damarus@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

The author of the article states

On one hand, Mejillones is arguing that Howard needs to be challenged more, but on the other Kuhlmann seems to think Todd Howard games need more Todd Howard in their DNA.

Howards could be more involved in the design process of their games, while also being challenged by his peers like anyone else working on the project. Yes-sayers avoid personal conflicts while ultimately damaging the project around them.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

[–] NeonNight@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Celebrity game devs always result in this dynamic to a degree. Hideo Kojima and David Cage are also creative leads that can get carried away if they don’t listen to other people’s ideas.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No shit.

You don't get a game like Starfield unless you are in an insulated yes man bubble.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

innerworkings

\sigh