this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
74 points (98.7% liked)

Selfhosted

46127 readers
508 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rowanthorpe@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I hadn't even heard of the underlying protocol NNCP yet, and it seems to solve out of the box several things I was trying to do in some of my own hobby-projects. I'd been battling with automating and integrating Tor/I2P, Openssl, Tox, GPG, Wireguard, etc. If NNCP lives up to the hype it will be a big shortcut, when I next get time to work on stuff :-)

[–] MigratingApe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wonder how hard and if feasible at all it would be to have something like an email over NNCP over meshtastic network. Total independence and resilience.

[–] mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] MigratingApe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ooh, that’s interesting. But I assume there is nothing stopping me from using both quux AND alternative routes to nodes (via meshtastic for instance) at the same time? I don’t have to go fully one way or another?

[–] mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud 2 points 2 weeks ago

yeah, I think so. So nodes are over meshtastic and some are over quux

[–] mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud 2 points 2 weeks ago

I didnt know of NNCP either, it looks amazing and super simple to setup. might have to look at how I run a NNCP forwarder to Gmail

[–] N0x0n@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Really cool stuff !! Something I need to try out for sure !

Just to bad they didn't add a multiuser setup example :( !

If you are doing any kind of multiuser mail node, you should have a separate SMTP system in front of this one that performs any necessary validation.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm trying to figure out how to add it to Mailcow Dockerized and hook the existing containers. If I sort it out, I'll probably PR it to Mailcow. I think it would a nice addition to start to build out a network that isn't susceptible to the same spam attacks as regular email (yet).

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I remember as a kid I set up one of the first private Echomail nodes as part of my RBBS bulletin board. UUCP was a big part of that, as I was the hop for other nodes coming onboard in my area. I added another half-dozen modems eventually just to handle the email traffic, then had to offload it to a university because I didn't want to have to charge for the traffic and it was getting too big to handle. But it was pretty interesting at the time.