this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
501 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

85333 readers
4440 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 304 points 6 days ago (16 children)

Yet people keep recommending products by this scummy company and pile on Firefox for slightest missteps.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 166 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (9 children)

Mozilla should be scrutinized, even if Firefox is currently the best option.

I think the only thing keeping them inline is loud community backlash everytime they make one of those misssteps.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 52 points 6 days ago (3 children)

People dont seem to be scrutinizing though. Its genuinely unhinged and often completely misinformed. They will jump on a single line of a legal text and use it to springboard into a world of scenarios even when Mozilla is saying its not true.

It doesnt help improve the product it just makes people think all products are bad and fallback to whatever the comfortable majority is which is chrome.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 22 points 6 days ago

Sometimes corporations lie.

It's not being unhinged to say you don't like something. And the way that Mozilla is embracing "AI" is not welcomed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think everyone should be held to the same standard. We can yell at Firefox a bit less. We should yell at Brave a lot more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 6 days ago

best

least worst

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 51 points 6 days ago

They removed the paw, they are worse than Chrome! I'm going to use an alternative version that cannot exist without the main project to teach them a lesson!

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 134 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Brave has always been a joke. And Brave users will always be a joke. And anyone who’s ever simped for Brave will always be a moron.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Rude. But not inaccurate. Brave pretends to be better than Chrome and Google, but also Mozilla and Firefox at the same time, though Firefox has always done it better and has never contributed to the chromium monopoly. Greed over diversification of the Web and competition between browser engines to effect real change. The least Brave could do is make their own engine.

Rude. But not inaccurate.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 67 points 6 days ago (11 children)

Firefox users stay winning. I love how mad some people are about Firefox.

[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 44 points 6 days ago

I am not mad about Firefox. I am mad about Mozilla.

load more comments (10 replies)

Fuck that leaky browser. Asshole development.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 41 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I feel like if you're writing the sentence "an optional, paid version of our browser that offers Brave [...] without its extra features," you need to sit back and take a long, hard look at yourself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 47 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The bad news is, if you're not on Team Tux, you're going to have to pay $60 for Brave Origin. Granted, you only need to buy it once, and you'll get unlimited activations across all of your devices.

It's amazing people still believe this BS.

[–] alanjaow@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (3 children)

They'll probably hold to it for that exact product. If they rebrand it and add it back, that's no longer the same thing you paid for ;)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 5 days ago

"Origin" is a peculiar choice for a version name. I wonder if they're trying to go off of the popularity of a common extension

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 26 points 5 days ago

Brave runs an ad network.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 57 points 6 days ago

Brave lets people use Origin for free if they're on Linux

lol

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 55 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Brave thinks its users are suckers

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Its founder and CEO thinks that gay people shouldn't have rights, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 36 points 6 days ago (2 children)

To be fair.....most of the general population are indeed suckers.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 29 points 6 days ago

To be fair, brave users are suckers

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] usernametbd@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 days ago

Use LibreWolf instead. Fuck Brave.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 41 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Reminds me of a joke:

My dad always warned us about Septic Tank Steve, and that we should never pay him to do anything, and we should have listened. One day Steve came by and said if we gave him a nickel, he'd swim around in the septic tank. We thought that was hilarious, so we gave him a nickel, and he swam around the tank a while. Then he came and sat next to us on the porch and said "If you want me to leave, gimme $100."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Can we agree that Brave:

  • Is scummy.

  • Has a shady ceo, and a shady history.

  • Is possibly a security risk.

  • Is still orders of magnitude better than using Google Chrome.

And that:

  • This headline is both true and clickbait-ish.

  • You can turn these things off in Brave’s settings, for free.

  • That doesn’t make this feature not scummy.

Basically no one should be using Brave, but no one should be using Google Chrome either, yet here we are.

And the revolving door of “best unabandoned Chromium fork to use” (Helium for the moment, or Ungoogled Chromium if you don’t mind some broken features, just to name two), is buried under so much SEO that it’s legitimately difficult to research.

So… I’m not gonna go out of my way to flame Brave users. If they’re trying to do better than Chrome, good! Not-Google is good. They can pay for this I guess. I’m not installing Brave, though, I’m not recommending it, and this certainly isn’t making me want to.

[–] terabyterex@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

use vivaldi if you want a chromium browser. its very customizable

[–] lonefighter@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Vivaldi concerns me a little, because I keep catching them trying to replace web addresses for major retailers with what appear to be affiliate links. For example, if I start typing the address for Amazon (I know, shitty company, but it's the first page that comes to mind) it will pop up an auto complete to click on. If I click it, I can see that I'm redirected to Amazon through what appears to be either an affiliate or a tracking link. However, if I type the address fully in the browser and don't use auto complete it takes me straight to Amazon, no redirecting or strange links popping up first. They do not disclose that they are doing this anywhere that I have found and I think it's shady as fuck. I don't have any extensions installed and it happens on multiple devices (phone, laptop, PC) and only on Vivaldi, so it's definitely the browser and not an untrustworthy extension or a compromised device.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 20 points 6 days ago

That’s a brave move.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Are brave and Plex related?

load more comments (2 replies)

There's no way people will actually pay for this, right? ... right?

[–] Deebster@infosec.pub 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The top comment on that site says you can already disable all of these features from within the settings. Is this true?

load more comments (2 replies)

Brave sucks, lol, I use other browsers

load more comments
view more: next ›