this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
230 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

85805 readers
3391 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bitflip@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

I heard they all have 64gb of ddr5 and rtx cards in them.

[–] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago (4 children)

If one of these bumped into me I feel like I'd want to tip it over in response.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Welcome to the Resistance. Simple steps like this are the right response.

TBH I think I’m at the rebellious point of do it without it bumping into me. Steal it’s cargo and dump it somewhere.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Saw a video of one of these things at an intersection asking a pedestrian to hit the walk button for it. He just laughed and said nope. I bet a real person could hit the button.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The thing is it it was an overall fair system most people would get along with the machines. But capitalists and ‘leaders’ have started to make us hate it.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

These must be pretty haltable tbh. Either by covering the lidar and I am guessing there will be a safety stop button somewhere. What happens then can the be force rebooted?

And how do they cross the road can the be fooled? Are they crossing after a sound occurs or is it a can see them being gps.

It’s gonna take bunches of us rounding them up like sheep and hearding them towards a locked field.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They'll have cameras and gps though. So be careful, the cops might protect it more than humans. Catch it in a faraday cage maybe.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

The cops are here to protect the property of the higher class, of course they'll protect it more

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] teft@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They seem portable enough to lug to a river which is exactly where it would go if one hit me or anyone i was with.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aramis87@fedia.io 64 points 1 week ago (5 children)

A lot of sidewalks in major cities don't have room for these. Especially if you account for traffic, light, and power poles, street signs, bus and trolley stops, subway and El entrances, sidewalk trees, garbage, trash and recycling bins, sidewalk grates, cellar entries, cracked sidewalks, etc, etc, etc. And suddenly you're being asked to give up one piece of space that's supposedly reserved for you, to yet another 'move fast, break things, get permission later' techbro "innovation" that no one's asked for.

There's no regulation over them, no standards that they have to follow or how to behave, no way for the public to specifically identify a robot when they encounter it in public (like, say, your robot ran into my car or whatever).

I'd only allow them if each robot carried a certain amount of insurance, was registered and had some kind of license plate, had turn signals (I don't know if they do, the ones I saw didn't), had limited operating hours and locations, were forced to move aside for humans, etc - basically make them the absolute lowest priority thing on the streets and sidewalks. Streets, bike lanes, sidewalks, subways, etc, were each built for specific forms of human movement. If techbros want to introduce a new type of system, they should be forced to build their own infrastructure to support it (no idea what that looks like for delivery robots), instead of just blatantly overloading already-stressed public infrastructure.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

they should be forced to build their own infrastructure to support it (no idea what that looks like for delivery robots)

Tunnels, at least in heavily populated areas. They already make pipes that should be big enough. It might require a slight redesign of the bots so that they can "climb the wall" a short distance to pass each other, and maybe extend/retract some bits depending on whether they're inside or out, but my heart would not exactly bleed over the money spent. And they'd be out of sight, out of mind most of the time for the rest of us.

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Food in the tunnels is how you get even more rats... And what would happen when one breaks inside. What about rotting food spillage.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 6 days ago

They obviously need to design cleaning robots and rat-catching robots and repair robots to support the delivery robots. I mean, we could have an entire robot ecology here, living unnoticed under the city streets.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they are going to put in tunnels, they may as well just put in a pneumatic tube system so the robots wouldn't be needed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 123@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago

It would be somewhat ironic if actual side walks were implemented to support these things on those affluent car dependent neighborhoods and people discovered cars should not be the focus when designing roads.

[–] SMillerNL@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

A lot of sidewalks in major cities don't have room for these. Especially if you account for traffic, light, and power poles, street signs, bus and trolley stops, subway and El entrances, sidewalk trees, garbage, trash and recycling bins, sidewalk grates, cellar entries, cracked sidewalks, etc, etc, etc.

That’s pretty awful because it seems to me they take about the same space as a wheelchair.

But my food might not arrive hot if all this is in place…

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 38 points 1 week ago

No wonder. The roads are not built for these things and nobody expects them there.

[–] Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 week ago

"broken-down robots causing obstructions"

It's littering. Call the sanitation department.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fuck you botly, I'm going clankertipping

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

"THAT'S CALLED CLANKTIPPING! HA HA!"

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

To be fair, the delivery robots I've seen (made by Yandex, which is known for bleeding-edge developments in self-driving technology) made good job to be as unobtrusive and predictable as possible, while also avoiding humans in quite a large range.

My only issue with them is that these are camera-equipped devices rolling the streets and likely sending all that footage to their Big Tech daddies. Besides that, they do their job well, reducing the need for hard human labor.

[–] YabbaDabbaDipshit@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I'm sure the people who were surviving off that hard human labor are thrilled

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m surprised that those who lost the work aren’t administers or some beneficiary of it. UBI seems to be the way??

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

"Won't someone think of the buggy whip makers?"

Not saying you're against it, but having an actual social safety net and not worrying about particular industries/workers/special interests is a WAY better way to think about governance and change.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jackusflackus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Kick the fucking things into the street

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

This is just one of many, many pieces of technology that have been just put into public from tech companies whether we like it or now. And they do it because they know there is no regulation, nor will there be anytime soon to reign it in.

[–] drphungky@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I'm all for delivery robots. The idea of having people in gas guzzling cars taking up huge amounts of city space while polluting, just so you can have a private taxi for your burrito is crazy. The main issue here is them taking up sidewalk infrastructure instead of car infrastructure. Fix that and we've got absolutely no problems. Tiny electric vehicles SHOULD be delivering things. Fixing this infrastructure problem is another great time to fix deliveries in general blocking side lanes, bike lanes, and slowing traffic where it does actually need to flow.

While we're at it, fix all traffic. Switch to a modified Dutch design of three types of roads (highways, distributor roads, and access roads) to further eliminate car interactions with pedestrians, cyclist, and yes probably small bot interactions. They should only be mixing on access roads. Dedicated and separated car lanes, bike lanes, and walking paths, and shared delivery lanes for bots and manned cars on access roads. It'll take time, but a simple plan and slow progress will eventually fix things and cause less havoc like adding cars did to cities that were all horse based.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If a human courier walked at me and wanted to go through me, I'm allowed to push them away. A robot doesn't have more rights than a person. Not likely to happen to me with a robto where I live though.

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What law would I potentially break if I tipped one over?

I've never seen one IRL where I live, they wouldn't make much sense in suburbia, but I suppose I might come across one someday, if they keep multiplying.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fall over in front of it and sue the Conisbrough for damages. If it's got wheels it's a fucking car and it should be on the road.

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 15 points 1 week ago

If it's got wheels it's a fucking car and it should be on the road.

Professor Xavier stares menacingly

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So little kids on bikes should be on the road? Skateboards should be on the roads? Wheelchairs should be on the road?

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id -2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Could you go and be outraged for delivery robots somewhere else?

Last I checked none of your idiotic examples were commercial delivery vehicles.

Pretty sure it was your classification that was idiotic

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Probably property damage. Same as if you stomped a kid's radio controlled car.

[–] michaelalf@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You don't have to damage it though... Just gently roll it on it's side for a little nap.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dalraz@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What is you just put a cup over its lidar sensor.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Or put a traffic cone in front and behind it? Definitely don't do that though, it's possibly illegal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you see one chuck it in the river

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Please don't pollute the rivers. Do something else please.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m not really bothered by these things. I walk around them just like I have to walk around humans and their detritus.

[–] SouthEndSunset@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Might not be that easy if you’re disabled, elderly, blind, or just not looking.

[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Seriously. Already annoyed enough at cyclists coming from behind who refuse to slow down and assume you can hear their stupid high pitch bells (not if you have hearing loss).

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago

Every day Bender seems more and more realistic.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago

In Atlanta last year, I watched one of these turning in tight circles for a couple minutes before I got bored and moved on. At least it wasn’t in the street.

[–] toebert@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

This may provide the first actual usecase for SUVs in cities. They seem to be about as tall as a child, so presumably invisible for the suv drivers.

Hopefully the robots will get mowed down when trying to cross the street.

load more comments
view more: next ›